I understand the meaning of the accusation, I just have seen no evidence provided to back up your accusation, Natural Law.
Show me how the poster in question has advocated Gnosticism. If you can, then you are not mind reading. If you can’t, then you are.
It’s really fairly simple and straightforward, no mind reading on my part necessary.
What do you think the myriad of references to an "illuminated study" means?