To: boatbums
Ummm...I don't remember Paul being there at the time. That is because Paul was not a Church official at the time. It is quite likely that he hadn't even heard of Jesus at this time, before the Crucifixion. Paul was in Tarsus, and not involved in day to day Jerusalem politics.
131 posted on
03/23/2010 7:41:07 PM PDT by
MarkBsnr
( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
To: MarkBsnr
That is because Paul was not a Church official at the time. It is quite likely that he hadn't even heard of Jesus at this time, before the Crucifixion. Paul was in Tarsus, and not involved in day to day Jerusalem politics. Okay....knew that...but the point, I thought, was that the reason Jesus did not leave us writings of his own teachings was because he would be sending the Holy Spirit to reveal truth and bring to remembrance those things he did teach in order for us all (the church) to know God's word of truth. You do admit that Paul was lead by the Holy Spirit in his epistles to the churches, right?
137 posted on
03/23/2010 7:48:39 PM PDT by
boatbums
(God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to him.)
To: MarkBsnr
That is because Paul was not a Church official at the time.SURE he was!
He was a PHARISEE!
192 posted on
03/24/2010 5:32:55 AM PDT by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson