This article is priceless! Amen!!
The article is full of fallacies as well.
Answer me this (and spare the testimony ok?)...why do the LDS want to be considered ‘just another Christian denomination’ but object to any examination, comparison, objections of their history/doctrines that Christians want to do, and AT THE SAME TIME go around saying “we are the ONLY ‘true’ church”.
Cognitive dissonance.
What is it about those who would challenge LDS doctrines/history that apparently scares the LDS so much?
A faith that cannot be defended is a faith that is not worth having.
Can you really defend the LDS? Or just slip into ‘testimony’ mode and claim ‘feelings’ rather than facts.
Been up on any good roofs lately ???
The term anti-Mormon is herein used to describe any person or organization that is directly and actively opposed to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, its doctrines, policies and programs. It is not, as critics sometimes mischievously try to claim, a catchall term for anyone who does not accept or believe in the Church, but is applied only to those who actively campaign against it. As an adjective, it applies to those specific activities that may with reasonable accuracy be described as attacks upon the Church.
___________________________________________________
That describes the Jesus of the Christian Bible...
Jesus is an anti-mormon...
:)