youre shifting the discussion.
Youre complaint was that I was using circular logic.
It would be circular if it was a single author book - however we know otherwise.
Some books show us the prophecy...others, by other authors, show us the fulfillment. Isaiah fortels Christ, the NT Gospels confirm it....
To claim it is errant is to allow that it is not the the complete blueprint for salvation...that is to say, God failed & Joseph Smith succeeded in restoring Gods inability to send the Gospel of JC through 1800 years (+/-) of history...
It doesn’t matter if the Bible is a book of books, to use an items to testify for itself that it’s inerrant is called circular logic.
BTW, throughout the history of the people of God, as recorded in the Bible, started with Adam and Eve, there are plenty of instances where people rejected God and chose a different path. Did God fail during those rejections?
Was the Reformation of the late Middle ages necessary started by Calvin, Wesley, and Luther?
You say that the Bible itself says that it’s the complete blueprint for salvation, but they Bible doesn’t say that outright, only with great inference will one be able to find that in the Bible.