Sola interpretura leads to errors because it’s a personal interpretation. Just as wmfights made his personal interpretation of a FACT without reading it completely, in the same way sola interpretura leads to the same error as the practisioners do not read the bible in it’s entirety as a community but are prone to individual errors, hence the rapid diversity in opinions
I see wmfights' question relating to Catholic practice of infant baptism. Should not Ambrose have been baptized earlier? But the question still remains about church practice when he is baptized------>Bishop in such a short time.
in the same way sola interpretura leads to the same error as the practisioners do not read the bible in it’s entirety as a community but are prone to individual errors, hence the rapid diversity in opinions
The diversity in opinion can be attributed to any number of factors. But, the diversity is no less in the Catholic church membership or in the Magisterium itself when doctrines of such import as IC and infallibility were not arrived at until late in the game so to speak. What happened to those who passed before they had the chance to embrace IC? Isn't it necessary to do so for salvation?