Skip to comments.
Cardinal: Catholics, Mormons must defend religious freedom together (OPEN)
Catholic News ^
| February 23, 2010
Posted on 03/01/2010 11:37:34 AM PST by greyfoxx39
Cardinal Francis E. George of Chicago, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, addresses an audience at the Marriott Center on the campus of Brigham Young University in Provo Feb. 23. (CNS/courtesy of BYU)
|
By Catholic News Service
PROVO, Utah (CNS) -- Catholics and members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints must continue to stand together as a "vital bulwark" against those in American society who want to "reduce religion to a purely private reality," the president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops told a historic gathering at Brigham Young University in Provo.
Cardinal Francis E. George of Chicago spoke Feb. 23 on "Catholics and Latter-day Saints: Partners in the Defense of Religious Freedom" as part of the Mormon school's forum series. He was the first cardinal to speak at the university.
Cardinal George praised the Mormons for their work with Catholics to protect the conscience rights of health care providers and institutions that do not want to participate in abortion or assisted suicide and to defend marriage as the union of a man and a woman.
"When the government fails to protect the consciences of its citizens, it falls to religious bodies to defend them," he said.
True religious freedom means not just freedom to worship or "individual conscience rights as long as you don't make anyone unhappy," but the right to "influence the public square," he added.
The cardinal said Catholics and Mormons shared not only a common understanding of religious freedom, but the common experience of growing from a small, sometimes persecuted religious minority to larger communities of 67 million U.S. Catholics and about 6 million U.S. Mormons today.
"Both our communities have prospered in a nation that respects religious freedom and recognizes that government should never stand between its citizens and almighty God," he said.
Catholics and Mormons also have stood side by side in efforts against "the degradations associated with pornography" and in promoting "respect for the lives of those waiting to be born and respect for marriage," he added.
Although he did not refer directly to the successful 2008 campaign to overturn same-sex marriage in California, in which Catholics and Mormons were prominent, Cardinal George said both religious communities believe that "every single person is made in God's image and must be respected."
"But that does not mean you accept everything they do," he said. "The relationship is at question here, not the persons."
He also said that those who "have gay people in their families, as I do ... have to be there for them and love them."
The audience at the 22,700-seat Marriott Center gave Cardinal George a standing ovation after his talk, which also was attended by two top officials of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints -- Elders Quentin L. Cook and M. Russell Ballard of the Quorum of the Twelve.
Cardinal George told the gathering that his own experiences with the church began when he went to Salt Lake City as a child with his mother, a church organist, who wanted to hear the Mormon Tabernacle Choir.
Many years later in 2007, he was offered an opportunity to serve as guest conductor for the Mormon Tabernacle Choir for one song. "Never had I been asked to do something like that," he said. "It was a tremendous feeling of awe and power and great satisfaction."
It was also "something of an ego trip" to have "that great choir waiting for me," Cardinal George said. And when he moved his arm, the choir erupted into "a magnificent sound -- all in unison, all in harmony," he added.
"I thought to myself, 'I'm doing better with the Mormons than I am with the Catholics,'" the cardinal said with a laugh. "I've had a lot harder time getting (Catholics) to sing together."
TOPICS: Catholic; General Discusssion; Other Christian; Other non-Christian
KEYWORDS: antimormonthread; catholic; christian; lds; mormon1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
This thread is OPEN to all comments within the Religion Forum rules as posted below. It is posted in response to threads that are closed to open discussion.
FROM THE RELIGION FORUM MODERATOR:
Open threads are a town square. Antagonism though not encouraged, should be expected
Posters may argue for or against beliefs of any kind. They may tear down others beliefs. They may ridicule.On all threads, but particularly open threads, posters must never make it personal. Reading minds and attributing motives are forms of making it personal. Making a thread about another Freeper is making it personal.
When in doubt, review your use of the pronoun you before hitting enter.
Like the Smoky Backroom, the conversation may be offensive to some.
Thin-skinned posters will be booted from open threads because in the town square, they are the disrupters.
http://www.freerepublic.com/~religionmoderator/
Thin-skinned (emotional, whiney or mercurial temper) posters are the disruptors on open threads.
To: greyfoxx39
That’s interesting...
While the Catholic Church has always been pro-life...
The mormons have not...
We have no revelation on abortion The mormons need a so called revelation to know that abortion is murder ???
The Mormon church accepts abortion for a number of reasons. The Church Handbook of Instructions, approved in September, 1998, states that abortion may be performed in the following circumstances: pregnancy resulting from rape or incest; a competent physician says the life or health of the mother is in serious jeopardy; or a competent physician says that the fetus has severe defects that will not allow the baby to survive beyond birth. In any case, the persons responsible must first consult with their church leader and receive Gods approval in prayer
This same Handbook, the official policies of the Mormon church to be followed by all local church leaders throughout the world, also claims: It is a fact that a child has life before birth. However, there is no direct revelation on when the spirit enters the body
Previous teachings by former Mormon prophets referred to the unborn child as a child, a baby, a human being, and decried abortion as killing, a grievous sin, a damnable practice. Spencer W. Kimball, the prophet who died in 1985, taught, We have repeatedly affirmed the position of the church in unalterably opposing all abortions (Teachings of Spencer W. Kimball, 189).
It appears that this unalterable position, constantly affirmed, is just another in a series of doctrinal and moral teachings that Mormons have reworded, reworked, rescinded, or renegedthough never officially renounced. Such is the quality of the Mormon belief in continuing revelation. Dont expect dogmatic or ethical consistency. Rather, look for expediency and conformity with the times.
A further statement in the Handbook says: The church has not favored or opposed legislative proposals or public demonstrations concerning abortion (156). While the Mormon prophet claims to speak the mind and will of God, he can neither figure out when the unborn child becomes human or if it is Gods desire that we protect the unborn unconditionally.
To: colorcountry; Colofornian; Elsie; FastCoyote; svcw; Zakeet; SkyPilot; rightazrain; ...
3
posted on
03/01/2010 11:47:57 AM PST
by
greyfoxx39
("The Economy Is So Bad, Even 'Rosy Scenario' Lost Her Job"-Jim Geraghty)
To: greyfoxx39
Thank you for posting this on a thread where we actually have freedom of speech!
4
posted on
03/01/2010 11:49:09 AM PST
by
reaganaut
( "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
To: greyfoxx39
those in American society who want to "reduce religion to a purely private reality," Does anyone have a CLUE what that means?
5
posted on
03/01/2010 11:51:37 AM PST
by
T Minus Four
(I already have a Savior. It's a President I'm looking for.)
To: reaganaut
Yes our 1st Amendment rights at work...
FReedom of religion, FReedom of speech, FReedom of the press
To: T Minus Four
That would pretty much put the kabash on door to door “witnesses”.
7
posted on
03/01/2010 11:53:50 AM PST
by
svcw
(If you are going to quote the Bible know what you are quoting.)
To: T Minus Four
they want to rule out any religious based opinion in the private sector.
8
posted on
03/01/2010 11:54:07 AM PST
by
Godzilla
(3-7-77)
To: greyfoxx39
I have no heartburn over this, just like I did not over the Prop 8 fight and indeed welcomed them to it and defended them over it. All are welcome in the political battle over secularization.
There are things of this world and things beyond. It requires multitasking as well as multifactored discipline to deal with it all.
If, in the very unlikely event, the Catholic Church (or any other mainline Christian denomination) comes out and addressed the LDS as fellow Christians and recognizes them as they now do each other, then...
9
posted on
03/01/2010 11:54:57 AM PST
by
ejonesie22
(Palin bashers on freerepublic, like a fart in Church...)
To: greyfoxx39
From what I see, the bishop is right. Freedom to worship means even if you think the other guy is wrong.
So, although I think Mormonism is a false religion, they do have the right to worship the god they choose.
Correct me if I’m wrong. Anesthesia still has me groggy and it’s not unlikely I missed something.
10
posted on
03/01/2010 11:58:46 AM PST
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: greyfoxx39
Is this one of those “The enemy of my enemy is my friend” kind of things? It’s no big secret that the mormon church still teaches that Catholics are the “Whore of Babylon”.
11
posted on
03/01/2010 11:59:27 AM PST
by
SZonian
(There are times when we have to tell loved ones truths that hurt. We do so because we care for them.)
To: Godzilla
they want to rule out any religious based opinion in the private sector. "against those in American society who want to "reduce religion to a purely private reality"....that IS a puzzling statement...it could almost relate to trying to limit discussion of religion in public....perhaps set up a situation where the discussion is watched closely for deviating from the "approved" content.....oh...WAIT!
12
posted on
03/01/2010 12:01:25 PM PST
by
greyfoxx39
("The Economy Is So Bad, Even 'Rosy Scenario' Lost Her Job"-Jim Geraghty)
To: metmom
Well, Praise God that you are able to be with us.
13
posted on
03/01/2010 12:02:06 PM PST
by
greyfoxx39
("The Economy Is So Bad, Even 'Rosy Scenario' Lost Her Job"-Jim Geraghty)
To: greyfoxx39
He also said that those who "have gay people in their families, as I do ... have to be there for them and love them." This line, however, wanted to make me puke.
It shows they've swallowed the leftist, liberal indoctrination that speaking out against homosexuality equates to *hating* them.
I hate what they do, but not them. I actually pity most of them, because someone I know who has lots of homosexual friends tells me that most of them hate it as well and are miserable, tormented people.
I know of one young man who killed himself because he could not come to grips with who or what he was. It breaks my heart every time I think of him.
14
posted on
03/01/2010 12:02:49 PM PST
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: metmom
The way things are going today anesthesia grogginess is probably going to make you more lucid. ,-)
15
posted on
03/01/2010 12:04:24 PM PST
by
svcw
(If you are going to quote the Bible know what you are quoting.)
To: metmom
You are right, politically and in a secular POV that is the correct approach.
Now spiritually...
16
posted on
03/01/2010 12:04:28 PM PST
by
ejonesie22
(Palin bashers on freerepublic, like a fart in Church...)
To: greyfoxx39
In a manner of speaking. Don’t know how much I’ll remember tomorrow.
La la land was nice. :)
17
posted on
03/01/2010 12:04:28 PM PST
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: SZonian
That is what it sounds like.
18
posted on
03/01/2010 12:04:54 PM PST
by
ejonesie22
(Palin bashers on freerepublic, like a fart in Church...)
To: svcw
It makes it less painful to read.
19
posted on
03/01/2010 12:04:54 PM PST
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: ejonesie22
Yeah, I know.
But my understanding of the Constitution indicates that view.
However, free will means freedom to be wrong as well.
You warn them of the consequences, but even God doesn’t force anyone to believe.
20
posted on
03/01/2010 12:06:46 PM PST
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson