You wrote:
“Then you contradict scripture. 27He has no need, like those high priests, to offer sacrifices daily, first for his own sins and then for those of the people, since he did this once for all when he offered up himself. - Hebrews 7”
Once again we see that anti-Catholics are grossly ignorant regarding scripture and its orthodox interpretation. Here are your errors:
1) Jesus’ sacrifice was once and for all - and that is the same sacrifice we re-present.
2) I already posted “re-present” or “re-presentation” so you are apparently as unskilled in reading as you are in Biblical exegesis. Don’t feel bad. That’s common among anti-Catholics. I do not know why so many can’t seem to read well, but it is common.
“Of course,the point of the original post is that scripture is to be taken with a grain of salt and a ton of sacred tradition!”
The point is that you have failed. Again.
From Post 85:
None of us offered Jesus as a sacrificial lamb.
We do - through the Eucharist we re-present that same sacrifice in an unbloody way.
Therefor, you claim you offer Jesus in an unbloody way as a re-presentation.
However, one of my points was that Jesus offered Himself. No man offers Jesus as a sacrifice - not then, not now.
And I posted again the scripture:
27He has no need, like those high priests, to offer sacrifices daily, first for his own sins and then for those of the people, since he did this once for all when he offered up himself. - Hebrews 7
Jesus offered himself, once for all. You do not offer him, nor does any priest.