Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Attorney asked by judge to remove Ash Wednesday observance
Iowa Independent ^ | 02/19/10 | Lynda Waddington

Posted on 02/20/2010 6:28:41 AM PST by Free Vulcan

A Marshall County Attorney in the midst of prosecuting an attempted murder case was asked by the court Wednesday to remove a smudge of ash from his forehead, a Catholic custom done in conjunction with the beginning of Lent.

Conservative writer Ken Black of the Marshalltown Times-Republican reports that Paul Crawford, an assistant county attorney, returned to the courtroom following a lunch break with the ash on his forehead. Catholics place the mark, which is often done in the shape of a cross, on their foreheads as a sign of repentance. The ash itself is often a by-product of the burning of palm crosses from the previous year, mixed lightly with holy water and sacred oils. Many recipients of the mark will wear it until it naturally wears off.

Prior to the jury returning, an attorney for the defense objected to the marking, and indicated that it could influence the jury in the case.

Judge Michael Moon agreed and requested the Crawford remove the smudge before the case proceeded. The attorney did so and the case moved forward without further discussion or incident.


TOPICS: Catholic; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: ashwednesday; christians; church; cross; iowa; law; ruling; state
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-140 next last
To: Free Vulcan
Prior to the jury returning, an attorney for the defense objected to the marking, and indicated that it could influence the jury in the case.

Sounds like the defense attorney was shopping for a reason to appeal.

61 posted on 02/20/2010 7:24:00 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charlemagne on the Fox
Good for you. Thanks from a Catholic who also sees in this ancient practice the response of the people of Ninevah to Jonah's warning.

They repented in sackcloth and ashes.

62 posted on 02/20/2010 7:25:27 AM PST by arkady_renko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
It is clear that you do not.

If you respect someone, then you do not quote them out of context.

Please check out Matthew 6 in its entirety, then, and enlighten us how the context is different from the passages cited.

The fact is, most of the chapter has to do with warnings against putting acts of piety on public display.

Mark 7:9 - And he said to them: "You have a fine way of setting aside the commands of God in order to observe your own traditions!"

63 posted on 02/20/2010 7:26:56 AM PST by arturo ("A dead thing can go with the stream, but only a living thing can go against it." - G.K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Francis McClobber
Ashes on one's forehead are evidence that one attended Ash Wednesday mass during one's lunch break. The issue is whether evidence that one attended Ash Wednesday mass during one's lunch break is admissible to a jury. It is not under Rule 403.

I'm laughing at your suggestion that the ashes are 1. not evidence of the above due to your hypothetical lack of foundation, or 2. evidence of something else.
64 posted on 02/20/2010 7:27:13 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: NoKoolAidforMe
In that case, remove the American flag, eliminate the ‘swearing to tell the truth under God’ and have everyone in the courtroom naked to ensure that there are no prejudicial facts, er, evidence that could sway the jury.

I could see how a prosecutor waving an American flag and shouting USA! USA! USA! might be prejudicial. /s

65 posted on 02/20/2010 7:28:35 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan

No, your honor-less.

LLS


66 posted on 02/20/2010 7:31:28 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (hussama will never be my president... NEVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

By stating that ashes on a person’s forehead is evidence that one went to Ash Wednesday mass is coming to a conclusion based on an observation. If a fireman has ashes on his forehead, does that mean he went to Ash Wednesday Mass?

Here’s the difference between a fact and evidence.

It is a fact that I opined that you were being condescending. it is a fact that you responded that I wondered why you were being condescending. I can use that fact as evidence that you were being condescending.

Thanks for the discussion.


67 posted on 02/20/2010 7:32:36 AM PST by Francis McClobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan
Prior to the jury returning, an attorney for the defense objected to the marking, and indicated that it could influence the jury in the case.

Judge Michael Moon agreed and requested the Crawford remove the smudge before the case proceeded. The attorney did so and the case moved forward without further discussion or incident.

The person ,Crawford that could have objected did not do so. He showed his respect to the authority of the court.

68 posted on 02/20/2010 7:33:02 AM PST by the_daug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charlemagne on the Fox

That’s what it’s supposed to be. But signs are polyvalent. As practiced by Catholics today, unfortunately, in some (many?) instances, Ash Wednesday ashes have become a tribal statement for Easter and Christmas Catholics. The old rule of thumb was that if you find yourself wanting to wear the ashes throughout the day, you should wash them off. If you find yourself wanting to wash them off (out of embarrassment), you should leave them on.

That said, I agree that there is a double-standard— Jew would not be asked to remove a yarmulke. So I think the judge was wrong in this case.


69 posted on 02/20/2010 7:34:43 AM PST by Houghton M.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Francis McClobber
I'm being condescending because there is no evidence (there's that word, again) in the article that the prosecutor did anything but attend Ash Wednesday services during his lunch break, much less a building on fire. Get a grip.
70 posted on 02/20/2010 7:36:06 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan
The judge requested..not ordered..the removal.

There is no problem for non-fanatics.

71 posted on 02/20/2010 7:43:06 AM PST by verity (Obama Lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

And one more thing: even if our vaunted prosecutor was in close proximity to a burning building during his lunchbreak, and appeared in court with ashes on his forehead, the judge would still have the power to tell him to wipe it off.
72 posted on 02/20/2010 7:43:43 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: harpu
"‘Paul Crawford’. a Catholic without conviction. "

Hardly. The court room is a place for lawyers to advocate for their clients, period. It's not a place from them to make personal political or theological declarations. Precisely, how would it advance the interests of his client to find himself on the business end of a contempt citation?

To brand this man as "a Catholic without conviction", is completely out of line.

73 posted on 02/20/2010 7:45:11 AM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Posted legal para refers to evidence not participants. Poor logic is evidenced here.


74 posted on 02/20/2010 7:46:41 AM PST by sgtyork (The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage. Thucydides)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sgtyork

Read on and weep.


75 posted on 02/20/2010 7:48:13 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: arturo

As has already been noted, ashes reflect the exact opposite of righteousness. Gotta do a little reading up there, fella.


76 posted on 02/20/2010 7:53:48 AM PST by EDINVA (Sarchasm (n): The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7
"But burkhas are ok."

There are a number of cases where judges have instructed women to remove the hijab from their faces. One of those cases may be found below...

Georgia judge jails Muslim woman for wearing headscarf to court

I believe litigation over this incident is ongoing.

77 posted on 02/20/2010 7:54:25 AM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: arturo
I think it fairly amusing that you use a Chesterton quote in your anti-Chatholic posts...

Here's another Chesterton tagline you might want to consider:

“The person who will not have a softening of the heart will eventually have a softening of the brain!”

78 posted on 02/20/2010 7:55:29 AM PST by arkady_renko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: arkady_renko
I think it fairly amusing that you use a Chesterton quote in your anti-Chatholic posts...

And I find it amusing that quoting Jesus is considered by you to be "anti-Chatholic."

79 posted on 02/20/2010 8:02:19 AM PST by arturo ("A dead thing can go with the stream, but only a living thing can go against it." - G.K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

I believe that the ashes would tell the jury that the wearer is Catholic. If there are any Catholics or any Christians in the jury, they may be convinced that his is the side of the angels. Alternately, some anti-Christians may be inclined to vote against his side simply because he has advertised his faith.


80 posted on 02/20/2010 8:04:13 AM PST by sportutegrl (VETO PROOF MAJORITY IN 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-140 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson