[MHGinTN]

Um excuse the intrusion, but your post made little sense. You asked, “Simply put, do you think you have a God-given right to view pornography?” But the previous verbiage posited an ‘unto Caesar, from Caesar, for Caesar’ scenario. I mean, the community has a right to write law based upon the community values, else you are no longer sovereigns of your community. Yet what you tried to posit was a transmogrification of unalienable rights and community sovereignty. Want to try again?

[Antoninus]

Yet what you tried to posit was a transmogrification of unalienable rights and community sovereignty. Want to try again?

My apologies. Perhaps I wasn't clear enough. In the case of this hypothetical local community, do you believe that by passing an ordinance prohibiting pornography, they are violating someone's God-given rights to consume the stuff? And, in your opinion, would such a violation require redress from the federal government?

Better?