Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When the Sun Turned Black
Insight Scoop ^ | December 5, 2009 | Paul Glynn, S.M.

Posted on 12/05/2009 6:00:32 PM PST by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-337 next last
To: sport; All

I don’t think anybody here is defending the Japanese or other enemies of WWII..

What I think we are saying was that the use of the bomb was immoral and many of us believe it was a war crime, evil, or something similar.


41 posted on 12/05/2009 8:18:32 PM PST by UFC Pride K1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: UFC Pride K1
I'm not glossing over it - it was not a war crime - the war would have gone on much longer and would have resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands on both sides. The bomb was the humane way to bring the war in Japan to a rapid close.

Lamh Foistenach Abu!
42 posted on 12/05/2009 8:19:30 PM PST by ConorMacNessa (HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines, RVN 1969. St. Michael the Archangel defend us in battle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ConorMacNessa

Really? How does the killing of an innocent child ever become moral?


43 posted on 12/05/2009 8:21:07 PM PST by narses ('in an odd way this is cheering news!'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ConorMacNessa

If targeting an *entire* city for destruction - knowing full well it’s a civilian target - isn’t a war crime than I don’t know what is...

Hastening an end to the war does not justify the massive killing of civilians.

Remember, the charge of “war crimes” belongs to the victor - as stated elsewhere in this thread, you didn’t see any of our guys on trial because we happened to have won.


44 posted on 12/05/2009 8:23:05 PM PST by UFC Pride K1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ConorMacNessa

If targeting an *entire* city for destruction - knowing full well it’s a civilian target - isn’t a war crime than I don’t know what is...

Hastening an end to the war does not justify the massive killing of civilians.

Remember, the charge of “war crimes” belongs to the victor - as stated elsewhere in this thread, you didn’t see any of our guys on trial because we happened to have won.


45 posted on 12/05/2009 8:23:12 PM PST by UFC Pride K1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth

Bockscar's temporary tail marking for the
atomic bombing mission on August 9, 1945

.


Fat Man exploding over Nagasaki, Japan during its use.

46 posted on 12/05/2009 8:23:22 PM PST by skeptoid (Skeptical and paranoid Bitter Clinger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ConorMacNessa

>>The bomb was the humane way to bring the war in Japan to a rapid close.

Humane? The bomb was an example of man’s inhumanity to may - these people crawling around “croaking” wouldn’t agree that this was a humane way to die, nor was it humane that they were not soldiers and could not defend theirselves or shoot back.


47 posted on 12/05/2009 8:24:40 PM PST by UFC Pride K1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: UFC Pride K1
"American soldiers attacking another country are not innocent - no soldier is “innocent” when attacking."

Our soldiers, attacking in defense of our country, which was the victim of an un-provoked attack in WWII, were innocent.

Lamh Foistenach Abu!
48 posted on 12/05/2009 8:26:07 PM PST by ConorMacNessa (HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines, RVN 1969. St. Michael the Archangel defend us in battle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

“Unit 731’’ Harbin, China. Damn right. Nanking, Pearl Harbor, Bataan Death March.....


49 posted on 12/05/2009 8:26:22 PM PST by JoeMac (''Dats all I can stands 'cuz I can't stands no more''. Popeye The Sailorman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ConorMacNessa

“Our soldiers, attacking in defense of our country, which was the victim of an un-provoked attack in WWII, were innocent.”

Even when they raped or murdered innocent civilians?


50 posted on 12/05/2009 8:28:39 PM PST by narses ('in an odd way this is cheering news!'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

Comment #51 Removed by Moderator

To: ConorMacNessa

>>Our soldiers, attacking in defense of our country, which was the victim of an un-provoked attack in WWII, were innocent.

What I meant is that they were going to attack, not that they were evil, immoral, etc. In other words, the fact that they were part of an invasion force puts them in a far different category than the priest giving confession who died in the blast.


52 posted on 12/05/2009 8:29:59 PM PST by UFC Pride K1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: narses

Ask the Japanese of the WW2 generation that question. They started the damn war.


53 posted on 12/05/2009 8:32:31 PM PST by JoeMac (''Dats all I can stands 'cuz I can't stands no more''. Popeye The Sailorman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

Comment #54 Removed by Moderator

To: narses

(Value of Life of 1 American Soldier) > (Value of Lives of 1,000 Enemy Civilians)


55 posted on 12/05/2009 8:34:28 PM PST by 10mm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: UFC Pride K1; narses
I presume you would have preferred that the war dragged on for an invasion of Japan. There would have been hand-to-hand combat mile by mile as we tried to bring a recalcitrant enemy to bay. They would not give up. Among their soldiers, the ratio of KIA's to POW's was enormous. They died in their holes from flamethrowers rather than give up. They flew Kamikazis into our ships. The carnage would have been unspeakable.

It was better to put an end to it quickly. Many more lives were saved than those that were lost. For once, Harry Truman had it right.

Lamh Foistenach Abu!
56 posted on 12/05/2009 8:35:08 PM PST by ConorMacNessa (HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines, RVN 1969. St. Michael the Archangel defend us in battle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: UFC Pride K1

The whole thing with the Japanese sounds to me like the kid that murdered both his parents and then threw himself on the mercy of the court because he was an orphan.

The Nation of Japan attacked us without warning while we were at peace and for the most part, the people cheered.

They slaughtered Chinese in every method imaginal for 10 years prior to attacking Pearl Harbor. Again, the people for the most part, approved. Admiral Yamoto advised against attacking America. For this assination plots were hatched against him.

And last but not least, every Japanese male , female, and child was ordered and indoctrinated to fight to the death when the Island was invaded. They were planning on inflicting at least 1 million casualites just on the beaches.


57 posted on 12/05/2009 8:35:55 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: narses
Of course not - now cut out the inflammatory comments and address the question at hand.

Lamh Foistenach Abu!
58 posted on 12/05/2009 8:38:07 PM PST by ConorMacNessa (HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines, RVN 1969. St. Michael the Archangel defend us in battle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: narses
How does the killing of an innocent child ever become moral?

How many of those "innocent children" had practiced their gutting skills on the living bodies of US Service members?

Japan was putting weapons into the hands of those "innocent children" and telling them to kill for the Emperor.

Maybe this is a question you should be asking the parents of the cute little tots.

59 posted on 12/05/2009 8:41:54 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (I miss the competent fiscal policy and flag waving patriotism of the Carter Administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: magisterium

Killing innocent civilians in war is murder. It is a war crime. It is a means to an end that cannot be justified. Whether innocent civilians are killed by bullets, firebombs, conventional bombs, atomic weapons, or simply starved to death is irrelevant.

In our age, unfortunately, the structures of our various global civilizations are so complex and entwined that war cannot be fought without killing innocent civilians. It is therefore impossible to wage a just war in the modern age. It would therefore seem that the only moral way to respond to an attack in the modern age would be to surrender immediately, and accept slavery or extermination at the hands of the aggressor.

However, any such surrender is itself a moral failure. Allowing one’s children to be enslaved or exterminated when one has the means to resist is likewise to commit murder.

Therefore, when an aggressor nation attacks, there is no moral solution. All options are immoral. To resist an aggressor leads to murder. To acquiesce to an aggressor likewise amounts to murder.

God provides a moral solution to the problem of war in the modern age. His solution is to not make war. We are to love our enemies, which means never committing any act of aggression against them. If this law were followed by all nations, war would not exist.

But since the aggression of nation against nation does exist, we are left with no moral option when attacked. To resist aggression means to become murderers of innocent civilians. To surrender in the face of aggression also means to become murderers of innocent civilians. War therefore makes murderers of both sides. This is the great tragedy of war.

Therefore, since we will end up committing murder whether we resist aggression or acquiesce to it, the only choice remaining to us is to minimize the number of murders we commit in the cause of national defense. Since we must murder innocent civilians in order to survive, the best course of action is to keep the number of murders we commit to the minimum possible. This is done by fighting the war as brutally as possible, in order that war be ended as quickly as possible, and the amount of blood on our hands be kept as small as possible.

And afterwards, when the war is over and the aggressor has been vanquished, it remains to us to fall on our faces before the Just Judge and beg His mercy, receiving in humility His just recompense for the innocent blood that we have shed. We can only trust that God will forgive us of murder; we can only pay the temporal penalty for shedding innocent blood.

***

When an embryonic human being becomes implanted into the Fallopian tube of his or her mother, no chance of a live birth exists. The baby is certain to die if left to develop. The mother will also certainly die if the pregnancy continues. The parents or other responsible parties in such cases are therefore left with two options: murder the embryonic human being by removing it from the mother’s body, or murder both baby and mother by allowing the pregnancy to continue. Since murder is committed in both cases, no moral option exists. In such cases — as in war — all we can do is murder as few people as possible in order to save what life we can, and to accept the punishment for our actions without self-pity and without complaint.


60 posted on 12/05/2009 8:45:07 PM PST by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-337 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson