Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

{Northeastern Iowa Synod} Council opposes ELCA decision to allow homosexual clergy
Cedar Rapids Gazette ^ | 12/5/9 | Molly Rossiter

Posted on 12/05/2009 8:33:07 AM PST by SmithL

A northeast Iowa synod council is the first in the nation to defy the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America’s decision to allow clergy to be in committed same-gender relationships.

A resolution passed last month by the council of the Northeastern Iowa Synod, based in Waverly, seeks to circumvent the controversial August decision by the ELCA’s churchwide assembly. The denomination currently requires that homosexual clergy remain celibate, and the council wants to maintain the existing regulations.

If successful, the move could ultimately restrict how churches call pastors in the future because it sets a policy where none existed.

The resolution was introduced by the Rev. Marshall Hahn, pastor of ELCA churches in St. Olaf and Gunder and secretary of the synod council. The council resolution passed Nov. 14 with a 10-5 ballot vote with one abstention and is believed to be the first to formally oppose the assembly of the world’s largest Lutheran denomination.

“What we’re saying is that we don’t want to change the rules that have been in effect for the last 22 years,” Hahn said. “The decisions at the churchwide assembly allowed for change. We’re saying we don’t want that change.”

If approved by the Northeastern Iowa Synod’s full assembly in June, any of the 181 synod churches that would hire, or “call,” a pastor involved in a same-gender relationship would be in violation of policy, Hahn said.

That could change how the denomination’s constitution is viewed, said the Rev. Steven Ullestad, bishop of the Northeastern Iowa Synod. Currently, churches have sole authority to hire pastors they want as long as the pastors are on the ELCA roster.

Hahn said he doesn’t see the resolution as restricting congregational calls but, instead, reflecting a prominent belief within the synod.

Responsibility for enforcing church policy falls to the main ELCA assembly, not individual synods. So it’s not clear what the ramifications of the Iowa synod’s move could be.

Ullestad has been criticized for not addressing the resolution. He said he doesn’t believe he should voice an opinion.

“I’m the pastor to the 100 percent, not the 60 percent who favor the resolution or who favor the assembly,” Ullestad said. “My role as the spiritual parent is to have the family have the conversation without me making some kind of fiat or encyclical.”


TOPICS: Current Events; Mainline Protestant; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: christianright; elca; homosexualagenda; homosexualclergy; iowa; lutheran; northeasterniowa; religiousleft; schism

1 posted on 12/05/2009 8:33:08 AM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lightman

It will be interesting to see how this plays out.


2 posted on 12/05/2009 8:34:00 AM PST by SmithL (SARCHASM: The gulf between the maker of sarcastic wit and the person who just doesn't get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Who wants to involve a gay clergyman in their spiritual life? I think it would be an unwanted distraction. How could you take a preacher seriously when he’s living a sinful and nasty lifestyle?


3 posted on 12/05/2009 9:07:17 AM PST by peeps36 (Democrats Don't Need No Stinking Input From You Little People)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
This is sort of old news.

The NE Iowa action has been discussed extensively on ALPB Forum where some have suggested that this action might well provoke an constitutional crisis; exacerbated by the fact that the ELCA lacks any supreme judicial office, other than opinions rendered by the ELCA Secretary.

4 posted on 12/05/2009 12:46:44 PM PST by lightman (Adjutorium nostrum (+) in nomine Domini)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aberaussie; Aeronaut; aliquando; AlternateViewpoint; AnalogReigns; Archie Bunker on steroids; ...


Lutheran (EL C S*A) Ping!

* as of August 19, AD 2009, a liberal protestant SECT, not part of the holy, catholic and apostolic CHURCH.

Marantha--Come, Lord Jesus!

5 posted on 12/05/2009 12:48:03 PM PST by lightman (Adjutorium nostrum (+) in nomine Domini)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Morgana
Amen...
7 posted on 12/05/2009 2:40:27 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist *DTOM* -ww- I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Ullestad has been criticized for not addressing the resolution. He said he doesn’t believe he should voice an opinion. “I’m the pastor to the 100 percent, not the 60 percent who favor the resolution or who favor the assembly,” Ullestad said. “My role as the spiritual parent is to have the family have the conversation without me making some kind of fiat or encyclical.”

1 Cor. 6:9Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders 10nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. 11And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.

So if the ELCA convention had passed a resolution endorsing unrepentant drunkards, slanderers, or swindlers as pastors, he'd be obligated to say nothing?

8 posted on 12/05/2009 4:48:03 PM PST by rhema ("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

To the degree that dysfunction exists within any human grouping (in this context, I decline to use the word family), the members of that human grouping will be compelled to focus their time, talent and resources on that dysfunction rather than on wholesome, productive activities.


9 posted on 12/06/2009 4:08:04 PM PST by RobinOfKingston (Democrats, the party of evil. Republicans, the party of stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson