Oops, I should have looked at the date. I think the thread must have been linked to a recent one, My bad.
What a non existant table of contents has to do with what we are discussing is beyond my comprehension.
The last question is not relevant to this discussion, I suggest you start a thread if you want to find that out.
Sorry to resurrect such an old thread, mea culpa.
You wrote:
“What a non existant table of contents has to do with what we are discussing is beyond my comprehension.”
That’s not a surprise. Here, let me help you since this obvious point is apparently so beyond your comprehension:
If there is no inspired table of contents, then how do you know with any assurance what books belong in the Bible? This is important for the most obvious of reasons: If the Bible is to be your guide, you must know that your Bible has what it is supposed to have and that it doesn’t have what it is not supposed to have. If you’re going to claim that the Holy Spirit is your guide to Holy Scripture then when and where did He provide you with a complete and inspired Table of Contents? After all how can you use scripture as a guide if you don’t know what belongs in scripture and how can the Holy Spirit be your guide to scripture if He won’t even tell you what is and is not scripture?
“The last question is not relevant to this discussion, I suggest you start a thread if you want to find that out.”
The question is absolutely relevant. I bet you just can’t answer it - which I already knew would be the case.
“Sorry to resurrect such an old thread, mea culpa.”
No, no, it’s been very amusing watching you founder. Perhaps you should just put more thought into what you post before you post it.