Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: GonzoII

I don’t agree with this, but it’s also a how-many-angels-on-the-head-of-a-pin type of issue.


4 posted on 11/03/2009 9:51:01 AM PST by Obadiah (Obama: Chains you can believe in!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Obadiah

You wrote:

“I don’t agree with this, but it’s also a how-many-angels-on-the-head-of-a-pin type of issue.”

Two points:

1) There is no evidence anyone actually EVER argued over how many angels could dance on the head of a pin. It may very well be a pious Protestant fraud from the Anglican divine named Chillingworth.

2) As a professor once pointed out to me: If the argument ever took place, it would actually be an important and useful way to explain the philosophical and scientific considerations about space and matter. Can an incorporeal being, or many incorporeal beings, occupy physical space in the physical world? Angels certainly seem to have done so according to descriptions in the Bible, but how exactly does that work out in the relationship between the corporeal and incorporeal? This sort of disputation was important for the development of arguments and theories related to optics, matter, etc.


44 posted on 11/03/2009 11:09:29 AM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Obadiah; vladimir998

http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/1008/did-medieval-scholars-argue-over-how-many-angels-could-dance-on-the-head-of-a-pin

I believe Erasmus and More both were among those who ridiculed the theological discussions of some medieval doctors.


111 posted on 11/03/2009 12:26:47 PM PST by Mr Rogers (I loathe the ground he slithers on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson