Posted on 10/20/2009 8:56:34 AM PDT by Alex Murphy
What is your first response when you hear someone refer to the mother of Jesus Christ as the “Co-redemptrix”?
Extreme? Excessive pietism, even if well-intended? Heresy? Only Jesus is the Redeemer. If not directly heresy, then extremely dangerous? At least anti-ecumenical? At best confusing?
Now let’s look at some people who have in fact called the Virgin Mary the Co-redemptrix: John Paul II (on six different occasions); Bl. Mother Teresa of Calcutta; St. Padre Pio, stigmatic wonder worker of the 20th century; Sr. Lucia, the Fatima visionary; St. Francis Cabrini, the first American citizen to be canonized; St. Jose Maria Escriva, founder of the Opus Dei; St. Edith Stein, co-patroness of Europe; papal theologians Cardinals Ciappiand Cottier; contemporary Church leaders such as Cardinal Schönborn, General Secretary of the Catechism of the Catholic Church; Mother Angelica, foundress of worldwide Catholic television and radio network EWTN; and a host of other saints, popes, mystics, prelates, theologians, doctors of the Church, and lay leaders, with an ecclesial line of succession dating back to the 14th century.
Do we see dangerous extremism, heresy, or any anti-ecumenical spirit in people like John Paul II and Mother Teresa? Would saints like Padre Pio and Mother Cabrini participate in Marian excess to the detriment of Jesus and his Church? Would Cristoph Cardinal Schönborn, general editor of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, use and defend the Co-redemptrix title if it were in any way unorthodox or theologically questionable? Would a Fatima visionary use, explain and defend the Co-redemptrix title six times in her last great writing, Calls from the Message of Fatima, when doing so would be offensive to the Holy See, who granted the imprimatur to her book? Or, even more, to Our Lady herself, with whom Sr. Lucia experienced direct mystical communications for decades?
Why, then, would we fear calling Mary the Co-redemptrix with Jesus, the divine Redeemer of humanity, when these pontiffs, saints, theologians and mystics for the past 700 years have done so?
What do people like John Paul II, Mother Teresa, Padre Pio and the throng of saints, mystics, and popes, precisely mean when they say that Mary is the Co-redemptrix? First of all, let’s be clear as to what do they not mean: 1.) They do not mean that Mary is equal to Jesus. 2.) They do not mean that Mary has an equal share in the redemption of the human family. This would indeed be heresy.
What they do mean when they refer to the Mother of Christ as the Co-redemptrix is that Mary uniquely cooperated with Jesus and entirely subordinate to and dependent upon Jesus, in the historic work of human Redemption.
Let’s define our terms. What is Redemption? Redemption is the saving act of Jesus Christ, through his life, Passion, Death, and Resurrection, repairing our relationship with the Father by offering just compensation for the sins of humanity, and thus restoring the possibility of sanctifying grace, and friendship between God and humanity, which results in the inheritance of heaven.
The term, “redemption,” derives from the Latin, redimere, and literally means “to buy back.” Jesus, through the merits of his passion, death, and resurrection buys us back from the bondage of Satan and the debt of original sin.
Now the question remains: can a human creature participate in this divine historic redemptive work of Jesus Christ?
It is important to remember that the Redemption of Jesus Christ is an act of restoring what was lost by two human beings, Adam and Eve. Although Adam, as father of the human race, was principally responsible for the original sin passed on to his descendants (cf. Rom 5:12), Eve also has an instrumental though secondary role in the loss of grace for the human family (cf. Gen 3:6). This is why the Fathers of the Church referred to Mary as the “New Eve” or “Second Eve,” since through her obedience with Jesus Christ the “New Adam” (cf. 1 Cor 15:45), she became in the words of the 2nd century Church Father, St. Irenaeus the “cause of salvation for herself and the whole human race” (Adv. Haer. III, 22, 4: PG 7, 989 A).
But can a human creature participate in a divine act, such as the divine act of Redemption?
Let us begin with ourselves. Can you or I as creatures positively participate in the salvation of someone else by our cooperation? By our prayers, by our good works, by our sacrifices, but our Christian witness, have we done anything that assisted in the “buying back” of another person from the bondage of Satan through the grace of Jesus Christ?
If you are a father or a mother and have raised your children in the Christian faith and had them baptized into the divine life of Jesus, did you not cooperate in their Redemption? What about if you are a priest who has a role in distributing the other sacraments of Jesus? Do you not participate in the redemption of other people, even though, once again, it is completely dependent upon Jesus Christ, the only and all necessary divine Redeemer?
Every time you pray for someone to say yes to Christ; every time you evangelize Christ by word or example; every time you pray to sustain a family member in faith during a crisis; every time you pray for perfect strangers who will die this day to accept their Redeemer with their final earthly breath-in all these prayers and works of Christian intercession, you are cooperating in the Redemption of another human being. You are participating in the application of the saving work of Jesus Christ in buying back members of the human family from Satan and sin.
While it is true that none of us participate in the obtaining of the graces of Redemption merited by Jesus at Calvary, every Christian is nonetheless called to participate in the distribution of his redemptive graces through prayer, sacrifices, and works of faith, hope, and love (cf. Col 1:24). It is precisely our Christian responsibility and obligation to participate in the redemptive work of Jesus Christ. This is why Pope John Paul II called all Christians to become “co-redeemers in Christ” (Jan. 13, 1982).
If we, therefore, can and should cooperate in the redemption of others, as long as it is absolutely clear, once again, that it is first and in every way dependent upon the redemption wrought by Christ, the one mediator between God and man (cf. 1 Tim 2:5), then why would there be a problem with the Mother of Jesus cooperating in the Christian Redemption of others as well?
In fact, the Bible reveals that the Mother of Jesus cooperated in the historic act of Jesus’ Redemption like no other creature.
At the Annunciation Lk 1:38, when Mary says “let it be to me according to your word” Lk 1:38 to the angel Gabriel to become the Mother of Jesus, can we not say that she uniquely contributes to the mission of Redemption by giving to the Redeemer, the very instrument of Redemption – his human body? The Letter to the Hebrews tells us that “we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all” (Heb 10:10). The instrument of Redemption was given personally and intimately to Jesus by Mary. What other creature, in virtue of the Incarnation alone, could claim to have a more direct and proximate cooperation with Jesus in his redemptive mission? But it does not stop there.
When the infant Christ is presented by Mary in the Temple and the prophet Simeon identifies Jesus as the “sign of contradiction” who will fulfill his redemptive mission (Lk 2:34), Simeon then refers through the power of the Holy Spirit to Mary’s own unique suffering with Jesus in the work of Redemption: “… and a sword shall pierce through your own soul, too” (Lk 2:35).
Scripture explicitly reveals that Mary will have a unique role of suffering with Jesus-the piercing of her heart-because she is so closely and uniquely a cooperator with her Son, the Redeemer. What mother would not suffer in seeing her beloved child die horrifically on the cross, especially if her child was a divine, innocent offering sacrificed for the redemption of the world?
Ultimately, the climactic hour of human Redemption takes place at Calvary (Jn 19:25-27). What happens at Calvary? Jesus is crucified, dies and offers his life in just compensation for the sins of humanity. Mary, Scripture testifies, is present, for the fulfillment of the self-same mission of Redemption. What is happening in the heart of Mary? She is faithfully offering the suffering of her Son, joined with her own, in obedience to the Father’s plan for Redemption. As a result of her unparalleled suffering with the Redeemer, the dying Christ gives, as his final gift to John and to all who seek to be beloved disciples of Christ, the gift of his coredemptive mother to be our own: “Woman, behold your son … Behold, your mother” (Jn 19:26-27).
Regarding both the Incarnation and the Redemption, the Bible reveals that Mary uniquely cooperated with Jesus in the historic work of Redemption. It is little wonder that as a result of her unparalleled sharing in the obtaining of the graces of Redemption, that God would see fit to grant the Mother of the Redeemer the privileged role of the distribution of the graces of Redemption as the spiritual mother of all peoples (cf. Lk 1:38; Jn 2:1-10; Jn 19:25-27; Rev 12:1).
Do we intercede by our prayers to bring the saving graces of Jesus Christ to others? Then why not, and especially, the Mother of Christ?
“Crucified spiritually with her crucified Son … Mary’s role as Co-redemptrix did not cease with the glorification of her Son.”
Pope John Paul II (Jan. 31, 1985)
“Mary is our Co-redemptrix with Jesus. She gave Jesus his body and suffered with him at the foot of the cross.”
Bl. Mother Teresa (Aug. 14, 1993)
Are you afraid to call Mary the Co-redemptrix? You shouldn’t be. John Paul II, Mother Teresa, Padre Pio, Sr. Lucia, and the endless list of other saints, mystics, popes, theologians, and Christian faithful who refer to her as Co-redemptrix do so with the assurance of Scripture, the Papal Magisterium, and the consolation of the Holy Spirit.
It is safe, it is true, and it is a title that she overwhelmingly deserves in virtue of the greatest human suffering in the history of man after that of her Son – a suffering offered in union with Jesus, for you and for me.
Be not afraid of Mary Co-redemptrix.
Dr. Mark Miravalle
Professor of Theology and Mariology
Franciscan University of Steubenville
President – Vox Populi Mariae Mediatrici
For more information on Mary Co-redemptrix, or to join the millions who have already submitted their petition to Pope Benedict XVI for a fifth Marian dogma of Mary Co-redemptrix, Mediatrix, and Advocate,
visit:
It is pointless to ping me to discuss this issue with a group which is determined to misunderstand, twist, denigrate, deny, and ridicule anything Catholic.
I, too, have spent two days listening to various protties on the subject of Mary, and I’m finished.
And it’s not the first time. Catholics are perfectly happy to allow anyone to believe what they wish, but will not be told by non-Catholics what they believe, will not be forced to answer for distortions of history, will not be interrogated beyond all reason by an inquisition of Sola Scriptura heretics, and will not accept as authoritative anything except the Magisterium.
So ping me all you want, I am going to ignore posters who have a history of mislabeling New Age websites as Catholic.
And they wonder why we can’t understand that infallible dogma?
lol. Tell us again about all that "Catholic-bashing."
mislabeling New Age websites as Catholic.
It was a photo of a Roman Catholic crucifix embellished with a picture of the Roman Catholic pope taken by a Roman Catholic priest.
If you don't like the photo, your argument is with the Roman Catholic priest who took the photo and thought it was charming.
It is pointless to ping me to discuss this issue with a group which is determined to misunderstand, twist, denigrate, deny, and ridicule anything Catholic.
I, too, have spent two days listening to various protties on the subject of Mary, and I’m finished.
And it’s not the first time. Catholics are perfectly happy to allow anyone to believe what they wish, but will not be told by non-Catholics what they believe, will not be forced to answer for distortions of history, will not be interrogated beyond all reason by an inquisition of Sola Scriptura heretics, and will not accept as authoritative anything except the Magisterium.
So ping me all you want, I am going to ignore posters who have a history of mislabeling New Age websites as Catholic.
lol. Tell us again about all that "Catholic-bashing."
mislabeling New Age websites as Catholic.
It was a photo of a Roman Catholic crucifix embellished with a picture of the Roman Catholic pope taken by a Roman Catholic priest.
If you don't like the photo, your argument is with the Roman Catholic priest who took the photo and thought it was charming.
Your turn.
INDEED.
BLESSED BE THE NAME OF THE LORD GOD ALMIGHTY.
Dr. E, if I’ve already been on a thread feel free to ping me, otherwise don’t. If I need to find out what thread you are on bashing Catholics on any given day I know how to find you.
Please name those Catholics so I may kindly correct them.
Thanks!
This is the same article you posted here
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2300721/posts?page=1218#1218
To prove how many Catholics believe this. It can be printed 100 times, it’s still the same article.
Thank you Al Gore.
The Roman Catholic Church does not validate this, per B16.
There are fringes in every group who wishfully think of their own ideas.
This isn’t happening. B16 addressed it.
I think you need to address the rest of her post which you left out before you say "your turn"- like about your habit of unsolicited attempts to tell Catholics what they "believe".
It was NOT a Cathlic website.
Let me guess - are they the same people who insist that no Catholics voted for Obama?
You mean like the other day when we were directed to a "Roman Catholic Website" called crystalinks.com?
It turned out to be the personal webpage of a woman named Ellie Crystal.
Now, you might ask yourself, "is this Ellie Crystal a spokeswoman for the Catholic Church?" And the answer to that would be, NO. In fact, Ellie Crystal is actually a Jewish psychic from Brooklyn who regularly converses with an "entity" she calls "Z".
Unlike the some denominations that split when they don’t agree with what the hierarchy says, Catholics keep all our people with different ideas. Eventually, they are corrected when they find out they are going no where or are excommunicated (as in the case of womenpriests)
In America we have people who believe in homosexual marriage, global warming, UFOs, redistribution of wealth, etc. They are all Americans and we are stuck with them.
Until the Vatican says that Mary is a Co-Redeemer, anyone who writes about it may be a decenter, but it doesn’t make it from the Vatican.
The non-Catholics may find this to be a big deal. Catholics don’t because we don’t branch off with different ideas.
What a strange delusion. Who said that?
Ooooops
decenter = dissenter
Thanks!
Ellie Crystal, "Z", an ET who arrived in is DC-8 which has been modified for intergalactic travel, the possibilities are endless.
LOL. Terrific.
Misguided? I bet God doesn’t think so, LOL.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.