Psychological Origins"
By Michael P. Carroll
Posted on 10/20/2009 8:56:34 AM PDT by Alex Murphy
Sorry, but I don’t keep track of your posting habits so you’ll have to get by on your own resources.
>>Not enough cogent information in your post to even attempt a reply.<<
That is a reply. *snicker*
>>Therefore, since so many Roman Catholics and popes believe Mary is a co-redeemer, it follows that there’s a very good chance the Vatican will declare that to be true.<<
The Pope on Co-redemptrix
“Yet when asked, in a 2000 interview by Peter Seewald contained in the book God and the World, whether the Church would go along with the desire to solemnly define Mary as Co-redemptrix, Ratzinger’s response doesn’t look good. He says that the title Co-redemptrix “departs to too great an extent from the language of Scripture and of the Fathers and therefore gives rise to misunderstandings” (53). He also says that “for matters of faith, continuity of terminology with the language of Scripture and that of the Fathers is itself an essential element; it is improper simply to manipulate language” (54).”
Thanks for your opinion, but it’s wrong.
I never asked you to.
I said:
If I need to find out what thread you are on bashing Catholics on any given day I know how to find you.
No.
Her actions don't indicate she understood the enormity of what she was being told.
She isn't alone, the Apostles saw Jesus walk on water, perform countless miracles and 3 of them saw him transfigured yet they ran away, or denied Him. John is the only Apostle who stayed.
Are You Afraid of Mary “Co-redemptrix”? >>>
no, not at all
Hail Mary Full of Grace
the New Eve
our Heavenly Mother
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.