Vatican Backs Obama's Global Agenda

ChristianWorldviewNetwork.com ^ | October 13, 2009 | Cliff Kincaid

[editor-surveyor]

Liberal and conservative Catholics alike would prefer not to discuss how the Catholic Church, here and abroad, functions like a liberal/left-wing political lobby.

Some pro-life Catholics are acting shocked that the Vatican warmly greeted the awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize to President Obama, who is pro-abortion. They don't seem to understand that the Vatican and Obama agree on most major international issues.

This is the untold story-how Obama and the Vatican accept major ingredients of what has been called a New World Order.

Another untold story is how, despite a disagreement over abortion, the U.S. Catholic Bishops and the Obama Administration agree on major aspects of so-called health care reform.

[Quix]

I’m quite happy to allow some folks

a Rip Van Winkle’s repose under their rocks.

[Petronski]

Awww, how cute.

You’re making it personal.

[Quix]

Occasionally, one has to return the favor.

However, in this case, I bothered to springboard off a fantasy cartoon image as I noted.

[bmwcyle]

WTF?

[narses]

+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.

Obama Says A Baby Is A Punishment

Obama: “If they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby.”

[Petronski]

...one has to return the favor.

Yeah, your violation of forum rules is my fault.

Right.

[Petronski]

See, if you're going to bring my wife into your personal attacks:

'harrassing' cyborg II?

I'm going to have to call you on it.

[Quix]

1. . . . nevermind . . .

2. affirming mention of friendly time with a spouse is a negative?

Amazing.

[Quix]

Most folks would treat such humor as a friendly thing.

Guess I should have known better.

[Petronski]

Yeah, trashing me is just ‘humor.’

[Petronski]

2. affirming mention of friendly time with a spouse is a negative?

Innuendo, look it up.

[Quix]

I think I have a different dictionary.

[Petronski]

I’m quite certain of it.

[Quix]

Guess I didn’t think long enough about all the possible perverse nuances someone might attach to a friendly affirmation.

[Quix]

Sometimes humor bridges gaps when nothing else can.

Sorry I didn’t realize fully enough yet again . . . . what a MISSION IMPOSSIBLE it was.

[Petronski]

...someone might attach...

Yeah, because you post an essay trashing me and the offense therefrom is my fault.

[Quix]

That’s one interpretation.

I should have thought longer about the high probability that the worst possible interpretation would be attached to anything written above my screenname.

[Petronski]

Do you hold yourself responsible for anything you do?

[Quix]

However,

far be it from me to try an tarnish anyone’s

HUMORLESS CROWN.