Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: sinsofsolarempirefan
Luther’s and earlier ‘heretics’ works were very influential in England at the time Henry VIII broke away from Rome. If this were not so, he wouldn’t have broken with Rome in the first place.People like Thomas Cromwell and Anne Boleyn were already protestants long before the break with Rome, and they lobbied Henry to make the break.... This wasn’t just a unilateral decision on Henry’s part, but one that he was persuaded into by others.

Henry wasn't a Protestant theologically. He considered himself most Catholic and against the lutheran and calvinist philosophies. He maintained the same episcopate, only putting himself in charge of the church in England, thereby allowing him to:
1. appropriate all the money and land
2. divorce and marry as much as he wished.
32 posted on 10/07/2009 4:41:55 AM PDT by Cronos (Oh bummer -- screwing up America since Jan 2009 - and doing a damn fine job of it too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Cronos

I know, I did mention that. Considering that Henry VIII was a lifelong catholic, the Protestantising zeal for reform of the Church in England couldn’t have come from him. Although apparently, some people seem to think this is the case when it is pretty basic knowledge for anyone who knows anything about the English reformation...


33 posted on 10/07/2009 10:18:20 AM PDT by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson