Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WATERS OF THE EARTH ABOUT TO RISE
The Joshua Chronicles ^ | Jedediah

Posted on 09/30/2009 5:22:13 AM PDT by Jedediah

ENTER IN BEFORE THIS BEGINS ! ! ! free republic | Jedediah

Posted on Wednesday, September 16, 2009 9:05:49 PM by Jedediah

Waters of the earth are about to rise ,

Some shall meet their maker and their demise ,

Those that before " Me " have turned and shut their eyes ,

Yet to my flock , my children I Shall reveal ,

The opening of a seal ,

A promise told of long ago ,

Yet even before I open it now you shall know ,

Because you daily inquire of ME ,

Just as David and Zadok you to shall see ,

My seers , My watchmen through the night ,

I shall reveal where to be standing through this plight ,

So see my children enter in ,

To " Zion , yeah " before this begins ,

For I AM your Menorrah , your Fullness , your Light ,

Walk on My path the Father's will this very night ,

Come ! My children inquire of me ,

To be protected during this catastrophe !

For this is just the beginning for there shall be more ,

Enter into Zion , your Menorrah for I AM your door ,

This light I am shedding , this pre-emptive view ,

Is meant specifically for you ,

My obedient , My humble , My Beloved ones ! \o/

Come ! Enter in before it has begun ,

For I am your Rock ,Your Cornerstone ,

Remain in Me do not go through this alone ! ! !

2 Samuel 15:25-28 (Amplified Bible) 25Then the king told Zadok, Take back the ark of God to the city. If I find favor in the Lord's eyes, He will bring me back and let me see both it and His house. 26But if He says, I have no delight in you, then here I am; let Him do to me what seems good to Him.

27The king also said to Zadok the priest, Are you not a seer? [You and Abiathar] return to the city in peace, and your two sons with you, Ahimaaz your son and Jonathan son of Abiathar.

28See, I will wait at the fords [at the Jordan] of the wilderness until word comes from you to inform me.

1 Chronicles 14:10-11 (King James Version) 10And David enquired of God, saying, Shall I go up against the Philistines? And wilt thou deliver them into mine hand? And the LORD said unto him, Go up; for I will deliver them into thine hand.

11So they came up to Baalperazim; and David smote them there. Then David said, God hath broken in upon mine enemies by mine hand like the breaking forth of waters: therefore they called the name of that place Baalperazim.

Psalm 91 1He that dwelleth in the secret place of the most High shall abide under the shadow of the Almighty.

2I will say of the LORD, He is my refuge and my fortress: my God; in him will I trust.

3Surely he shall deliver thee from the snare of the fowler, and from the noisome pestilence.

4He shall cover thee with his feathers, and under his wings shalt thou trust: his truth shall be thy shield and buckler.

5Thou shalt not be afraid for the terror by night; nor for the arrow that flieth by day;

6Nor for the pestilence that walketh in darkness; nor for the destruction that wasteth at noonday.

7A thousand shall fall at thy side, and ten thousand at thy right hand; but it shall not come nigh thee.

8Only with thine eyes shalt thou behold and see the reward of the wicked.

9Because thou hast made the LORD, which is my refuge, even the most High, thy habitation;

10There shall no evil befall thee, neither shall any plague come nigh thy dwelling.

11For he shall give his angels charge over thee, to keep thee in all thy ways.

12They shall bear thee up in their hands, lest thou dash thy foot against a stone.

13Thou shalt tread upon the lion and adder: the young lion and the dragon shalt thou trample under feet.

14Because he hath set his love upon me, therefore will I deliver him: I will set him on high, because he hath known my name.

15He shall call upon me, and I will answer him: I will be with him in trouble; I will deliver him, and honour him.

16With long life will I satisfy him, and shew him my salvation.


TOPICS: Charismatic Christian; Current Events; Ecumenism; Evangelical Christian
KEYWORDS: earthquakes; globalwarminghoax; rising; tsunami; wackadoodle; waters
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 361-374 next last
To: Boogieman; Amityschild; Blogger; boatbums; Brad's Gramma; Cvengr; DvdMom; firebrand; ...

Methinks your biases are raging forth overmuch.

If the big wormwood meteor/mountain crashes into the Pacific, depending on where and it’s size, certainly the effects of increased water on the shores (however temporarily) of the whole planet would be significant—probably with considerable sloshing back and forth reverberating repeatedly for some time.

If it crashes as some are convinced it will, in the Atlantic . . . then certainly those coaselines would be incredibly inundated quite a considerable distance . . . it would likely shake loose the Canary Island thing if it hadn’t already been shaken loose and that would add to the inundations to a considerable depth and a considerable period of reverberations.

How many hours of such would be too short for you to consider that from the standpoint of those inundated, the sea levels had indeed risen devastatingly?

In terms of the rest of it, I don’t think you have much of an accurate Biblical perspective on the New Testament prophetic either from Scripture and most probably less from first hand personal experience.

It’s not exactly a relaxing thing to be pressed forward of The Lord with His Big Boot in one’s back-side

to speak for Him to an individual, a couple, a family, a church . . . and all one has is the first word or 3. Of course one knows that God tends to expect one to jump out of the boat and then He’ll make the water firm; speak the 3 words and the 4th, 5th, etc. will follow.

And, hopefully, the tangible, experiential ‘unction’ ‘feeling’ of Holy Spirit pouring through one will give some measure of confirmation that one is not just ranting from a pooly made taco a few hours earlier.

And, maybe something will pour forth that you could not have known about the person one is speaking to . . . except by Holy Spirit and it therefore blesses that person as vivid confirmationi and they are all the more open to The Lord’s blessing through the word given. And they are comforted, brought closer to The Lord, healed etc. etc. in lasting very redemptive Biblical ways.

And one shares the last words that seem to be coming forth and nothing else comes and one has the good sense, for once to shut up and let it be and ask the person to prayerfully ponder what of it may be from The Lord.

And, the person likely says, Oh, all of it, all of it! Praise God! Bless the Lord. Thank you! It’s just what I needed. How could you know? Oh, right, The Lord! LOL.

Yet, sometimes one shares similarly and the person bows up and resists and declares one’s shared out of the flesh or off the wall or out of a bias or personal antipathy toward the individvual or some other such claim/blame.

And one takes the criticism to The Lord and The Lord says—OH, NO! YOU WERE 100% CORRECT, THEY JUST ARE UNWILLING TO RECEIVE IT. The results are my business, walk on down the road and trouble yourself no more about it.

And the offended person may spread far and wide what a false prophet one is.

In weeks or months or years what one prophesied will come to pass and the person will either cry uncle or deny still and suffer still more consequences—probably still blaming the “false prophet” that wasn’t false at all.

And, sometimes, whether due to insufficient prayer and fasting or some spiritual struggle within one’s own life, one doesn’t hear quite accurately and one’s flesh does get involved as though it was from The Lord. There’s certainly all manner of trouble, then.

I don’t have the refs handy though I’ve posted them hereon before. There were a couple of instances in the OT when famous prophets truly of God missed it. And they were not stoned. So even your Old Testament standard is flawed—all the more so trying to apply it to the New Testament Church era.

Holy Spirit’s still small voice . . . particularly when one is just beginning to step out into one’s prophetic gifting and/or calling, can be incredibly hard to distinguish from one’s own intense thoughts and feelings.

IT IS A PROCESS TO LEARN TO DISTINGUISH. IT IS OFTEN A TRIAL AND ERROR PROCESS. I would rather it weren’t but so far, that seems to be the case far more often than not—at least with most folks I know first hand. Some have claimed to be otherwise but I’m not often been impressed with their flawlessness near as much as they were.

There’s more safety in following a I Cor 14 model of a local congregaton vetting a given pronouncement. Yet, I’ve seen that flawed as well. Folks give assent to things for more than pure Holy Spirit reasons.

I think . . . my opinion . . . one of the reasons Jedediah and some of the other FREEPER prophetic folks respect one another so much is that we can be quite sternly candid with one another and still love one another and have the relationship even strengthened.

That’s sadly not all that common even in the prophetic—though, thankfully, it is becoming more so.

There is a teaching that the prophetic is to upbuild, encourage, strengthen. I think that’s to be the net effect. However, it is to also zero in on crud and help cut it out, rebuke it, remove it from the individual and the local Body of Christ.

Yet, on that score, Sometimes prophetic types operate in the flesh out of a bias and a critical spirit that The Lord has not finished removing from their lives yet and all manner of trouble results.

And, sometimes, even the most anointed, gentle, loving rebuke meets with a rebellious spirit and trouble is again wholesale at the door. That takes real leadership in those situations.

It’s all the worse when the receiver is some leader stuck on their own press clippings and social status . . . and The Lord has sent an unattractive easily dismissed in the natural almost street person sort of prophet to rebuke them. Seems to be one of His habits. Typically the GREAT MAN OF GOD will bluster and fuss and rant and rave and blame and not remotely hear the prophetic rebuke.

I’ve seen 3 differnt pastors die that way—one within 30-40 days all the way across the Pacific from where I was in Taipei; and the other within the year I’d stated in Arizona around 1967 or 68. . . . when I was the message bearer.

I saw another powerful ministry fall apart and 2 divorces of the Head Pastor’s 2 daughters that might could have been avoided had they listened. I was just one of many speaking warnings to them in that situation.

That The Lord used or attempted to use me at all, in those situations as flawed as I was at the times involved is mind boggling. Yet, HE SEEMS TO HAVE A HOBBY OF USING THE FLAWED, THE BIRDS OF RARE PLUMAGE, THE FOLKS OTHERS MOST EASILY DISMISS. I think it leaves HIM more glory.

Eventually, one learns to hear better and speak only what one hears The Father say. I don’t know that I’m there. I’m skeptical. Yet, I know God is pushing me toward that mark of the High Calling and He’s also enabling, cleansing, maturing me to that point in ways I couldn’t begin to do myself.

I’m just realizing that this is about me. sigh. I hope that perhaps the RM will realize this is all by illustration and not intended, per se, to be about me.

If it’s still out of bounds, perhaps I can put it on my personal style opus in the blogger section.

I don’t really care to get into a . . . water fight . . . about the above. It’s my experience and that of virtually every prophetic person I’ve ever met. Argue the theory all you want. Doesn’t stand a chance against my experience. Nor against the experience of anyone who’s dared to say

“YES” TO GOD’S COMMAND TO —STAND UP AND BE COUNTED— SUCH A DEAL I HAVE FOR YOU—YOU WANTED ME TO USE YOU HOWEVER I CHOSE—I CHOOSE THIS—NOW SUBMIT AND OBEY.

Gulp.


181 posted on 10/05/2009 9:11:29 PM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Quix

Thanks for the ping!


182 posted on 10/05/2009 9:23:12 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: UriÂ’el-2012; Quix

To me, it sounded like it was an anonymous post, I don’t think I caught the guy’s name anywhere. If it was there, I missed it.


183 posted on 10/05/2009 10:05:19 PM PDT by Joya (Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, Savior, have mercy on me, a sinner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

Comment #184 Removed by Moderator

To: Quix; Jedediah

Presumably the role of a NT prophet (e.g., Ephesians 4:11-13) is understood by the one who has been gifted for that role. It makes me wonder about the heart of one that claims to be exercising that gift on an internet forum.

Are the saints trained in the work of ministry? Is the body of Christ builded up by this vanity?

185 posted on 10/05/2009 11:25:25 PM PDT by delacoert (Good health to your belly button.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: delacoert

It might be wise to be certain that such a sharing is a vanity. Maybe it’s not a vanity. How does God see it? If He sees it differently than you, you could be in trouble.


186 posted on 10/05/2009 11:41:57 PM PDT by Joya (Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, Savior, have mercy on me, a sinner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Joya

Here’s an interesting prediction from a purported power that be person . . . new agey or some such.

Interesting how emphatically it has to do with water inundating coastlines around the world.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread476788/pg1


187 posted on 10/06/2009 12:33:58 AM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Quix; All

Here’s one I’d not seen before on handofhelp.com website, Iuliana’s testimony, check it out,

http://www.handofhelp.com/test_iuliana.php


188 posted on 10/06/2009 12:37:59 AM PDT by Joya (Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, Savior, have mercy on me, a sinner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Joya

THANKS.


189 posted on 10/06/2009 12:42:32 AM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator; narses; Alex Murphy; Quix
I had intended to let the matter go, as your answer in #111 seemed adequate.

Until now.

What he must not do is "make it personal" by saying such things as "you're a liar" "have you taken your meds?" "you're only saying this because..." and so on.

Please review, for example, #150, #154, #158 ... Are those posts not examples of "making it personal" by way of mind-reading and ascribing motives?

Please also examine #155, in which the poster hangs his entire argument from the hook of his own (alleged) personal experience and personal credibility? Is this not an example of "making it personal"? He has, it seems to me, very much made himself (rather than the original topic) the subject of discussion.

Ping to interested parties.

190 posted on 10/06/2009 6:11:38 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard; Quix
The poster has chosen his words carefully to condemn the statements made but not the poster, personally. They are clearly pushing the envelope but they fall short of "making it personal."

For instance, if a poster said "you are stupid" that would be making it personal. On the other hand, if he said "that's a stupid way of doing things" it would not be making it personal.

I can and do intervene to keep posters from making it personal. But there is nothing I can do to keep posters from taking it personally.

Thick skin is required on "open" threads in the Religion Forum. But every Freeper has a niche. So if the open style is not his cup of tea, he should ignore them altogether and instead post to the "prayer" "devotional" "caucus" or "ecumenical" threads.

Also, post 155 is a personal endorsement or testimony which should be expected on any type of RF thread. If however the thread transformed into a discussion of the poster, personally, instead of whatever he is endorsing then it would be "making it personal."

191 posted on 10/06/2009 8:56:21 AM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator; Quix; narses; Alex Murphy
From your profile page:

Reading minds and attributing motives are forms of “making it personal.”

I fail to see how "Still chafing against [whatever]?" is not mind reading.

I fail to see how "Still ... pretending to appeal to [whatever]?" is not attribution of motive (to deceive).

I fail to see how "STILL TRYING AGGRESSIVELY TO CONFORM [whatever]" is not attribution of motive.

post 155 is a personal endorsement or testimony which should be expected on any type of RF thread.

Fine. It still depends upon the poster's personal credibility. Is it permissible in any way to challenge that credibility? After all ... "Thick skin is required on "open" threads in the Religion Forum. "

RM: I am not trying to stir up trouble ... I am trying to understand the parameters of this forum. I find the rules posted on the RM profile page to raise almost as many questions as they answer. Although those questions may have come from a large number of threads, I find this one a convenient location to ask them. Thank you for the discussion.

Ping to interested parties.

192 posted on 10/06/2009 9:38:45 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator
The poster has chosen his words carefully to condemn the statements made but not the poster, personally.

I could agree with that if the poster had restricted his comments to "inferences and extrapolations"

But "biases and hostilities" seems to me to condemn the poster himself, or at least to be both reading his mind and attributing motive.

Apologies that this was not included in the previous post.

193 posted on 10/06/2009 9:42:17 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: Joya

Get off it. New Testament instruction and operation of spiritual gifts in the Body is knowable. I question the maturity and motive of anyone who causes a public disturbance by claiming and acting out Holy Spirit gifting and ministry.

194 posted on 10/06/2009 10:39:10 AM PDT by delacoert (Good health to your belly button.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

Sometimes a short English refresher course is posted . . . about

THE DIFFERENCE

between

you, he, she, your’s

and

generalized IMPERSONAL

their, y’all’s, most of, . . . xyz GROUP . . .

Though, it’s a common observation hereon . . . that even with a group of porkers . . . one can usually tell which one’s been most personally pricked, chosen to take the most personal offense . . . by the generalized gig . . . their squeel is the loudest.


195 posted on 10/06/2009 11:31:53 AM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: delacoert

Question away.

Jesus was pretty good at causing such public disturbances.


196 posted on 10/06/2009 11:32:42 AM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: Quix
Thank you for posting a defense of the rhetoric which is currently on trial.

It was a most incoherent defense ... but that's OK.

Even Charles Manson was entitled to a defense.

197 posted on 10/06/2009 11:35:23 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

A tricky art form, isn’t it.


198 posted on 10/06/2009 11:55:58 AM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

Though, of course,

God looks on the motives of the heart.


199 posted on 10/06/2009 11:56:52 AM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

. . .

of the rhetoric which is currently

. . .

on trial.

. . .

evidently in some . . . . minds.


200 posted on 10/06/2009 11:59:50 AM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 361-374 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson