Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Survey Reveals Prevalence of (Protestant) Clergy Sexual Misconduct
Christian Post ^ | September 11, 2009 | Audrey Barrick

Posted on 09/12/2009 6:44:04 AM PDT by NYer

Findings from a nationwide study reveal that clergy sexual misconduct is more prevalent than many people believe.

According to research by Baylor University, 3.1 percent of adult women who attend religious services at least once a month have been victims of clergy sexual misconduct since turning 18. In other words, seven women in every congregation of 400 adults have been victimized.

Ninety-two percent of the sexual advances were made in secret and 67 percent of the offenders were married to someone else at the time of the advance.

"Because many people are familiar with some of the high-profile cases of sexual misconduct, most people assume that it is just a matter of a few charismatic leaders preying on vulnerable followers," said Dr. Diana Garland, dean of the School of Social Work at Baylor University and lead researcher in the study, in a statement Wednesday. "What this research tells us, however, is that Clergy Sexual Misconduct with adults is a widespread problem in congregations of all sizes and occurs across denominations. Now that we have a better understanding of the problem, we can start looking at prevention strategies."

The study, which was conducted on more than 3,500 American adults, is the largest scientific study into clergy sexual misconduct and is being published later this year in the Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.

It is part of an effort by Baylor to identify and prevent clergy sexual misconduct. With virtually no research or information available to inform prevention strategies, Baylor University's School of Social Work sought to provide data for that purpose. Along with spreading awareness and educating the public, the team at Baylor hopes the findings will be used to draft model legislation to make it illegal for clergy to make sexual advances just as it is with patients and doctors.

Sexual misconduct by clergy is only illegal in Texas and Minnesota.

Garland hopes the study will prompt congregations to consider adopting policies and procedures designed to protect their members from leaders who abuse their power.

"Many people – including the victims themselves – often label incidences of Clergy Sexual Misconduct with adults as 'affairs,'" said Garland. "In reality, they are an abuse of spiritual power by the religious leader."

The research study also includes a paper co-authored by Garland on first-hand accounts from men and women who are victims of clergy sexual misconduct, family members or spouses of victims, religious leaders who have committed CSM, and helping professionals who have provided care for offenders and survivors.

Data from the 2008 General Social Survey – an in-person survey conducted by National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago – was used to estimate the prevalence of clergy sexual misconduct. Questions developed specifically for this project were administered by the Baylor team.

Clergy sexual misconduct was defined as minister, priests, rabbis, or other clergypersons or religious leaders who make sexual advances or propositions to persons in the congregations they serve who are not their spouses or significant others.


TOPICS: Catholic; Moral Issues
KEYWORDS: adultery; baptist; catholic; clergy; moapb; pastors; protbashing; protestant; protestantabuse; sexabuse; sin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-143 next last
To: Petronski

“You have a vivid imagination.”

Thank you, you are very kind, and it is nice to leave on a positive note.


101 posted on 09/12/2009 3:29:02 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

That was not a positive note.


102 posted on 09/12/2009 3:40:50 PM PDT by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer
One does not need to read minds to see the obvious.<.i>

Right on...But no problem...What's important are the lurkers who may be swayed one way or the other...Whoever ever of them watched this attempted deception were I'm sure shown a little bit of the 'truth' put out by the so called one true Church...

103 posted on 09/12/2009 3:41:48 PM PDT by Iscool (I don't understand all that I know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

“That was not a positive note.”

Yes it was...


104 posted on 09/12/2009 3:45:57 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

You consider all the false and imagined statements you posted positive?

That level of delusion is a sad thing. Not positive.


105 posted on 09/12/2009 3:46:45 PM PDT by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

“You consider all the false and imagined statements you posted positive?”

I was trying not to assign ill-motive to you. Granted, you’re making it hard with all the semantic games you play, but still...

“That level of delusion is a sad thing. Not positive.”

Friend, if I actually explained what was going on to you, it would make it less fun for me. You’ll figure it out eventually.


106 posted on 09/12/2009 3:49:24 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
The article never mentions "Protestant", the title doesn't mention "Protestant" and the description of the study clearly states that it is all faiths.

Looks like you've outed an anti-Protestant bigot.

107 posted on 09/12/2009 3:50:17 PM PDT by Mojave (Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

As I said: you have a vivid imagination, not in a good way.


108 posted on 09/12/2009 3:50:28 PM PDT by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Iscool

“I’m sure shown a little bit of the ‘truth’ put out by the so called one true Church...”

Friend, Do not judge Catholicism by the acts of a few misguided individuals on this thread. The VAST majority of Catholic faithful want to do the right thing.


109 posted on 09/12/2009 3:52:33 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

“As I said: you have a vivid imagination, not in a good way.”

I choose to take it in a good way, so thank you.


110 posted on 09/12/2009 3:53:28 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

If you are going to claim to be the only true church,
act like one - be sexually pure.

If you don’t want to be sexually pure, and expel those
priests who are not, then don’t claim to represent
Christ.


111 posted on 09/12/2009 6:05:59 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Petronski; NYer; ansel12
"The article is from a Protestant journal with the focus on protestant clergy. "

No it's not. Are rabbis protestant? As ansel12 pointed out, the authors of the article considered and wrote about Catholic clergy also.

""Clergy sexual misconduct was defined as minister, priests, rabbis, or other clergypersons or religious leaders who make sexual advances or propositions to persons in the congregations they serve who are not their spouses or significant others."

112 posted on 09/12/2009 6:28:14 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion
If you are going to claim to be the only true church, act like one - be sexually pure.

If you don’t want to be sexually pure, and expel those priests who are not, then don’t claim to represent Christ.

That is not our, nor your, prerogative to demand.

113 posted on 09/12/2009 6:44:34 PM PDT by papertyger (A difference that makes no difference is no difference)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: papertyger
"If you don’t want to be sexually pure, and expel those priests who are not, then don’t claim to represent Christ. "That is not our, nor your, prerogative to demand. Not mine or yours, but God has made Himself clear. "3 For this is the will of God, your sanctification; that is, that you abstain from sexual immorality; 4 that each of you know how to possess his own vessel in sanctification and honor, 5 not in lustful passion, like the Gentiles who do not know God; 6 and that no man transgress and defraud his brother in the matter because the Lord is the avenger in all these things, just as we also told you before and solemnly warned you. 7 For God has not called us for the purpose of impurity, but in sanctification. 8 So, he who rejects this is not rejecting man but the God who gives His Holy Spirit to you."
114 posted on 09/12/2009 7:29:00 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

It can not be that clear. You don’t seem to be able to distinguish between the individual and the Church.


115 posted on 09/12/2009 7:49:51 PM PDT by papertyger (A difference that makes no difference is no difference)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

Comment #116 Removed by Moderator

To: Salvation
Fathers of children

Does this include step-fathers? Does the study distinguish betwwen the percentage of biological fathers vs. stepfathers or even bio-mom's new boyfriend? Just curious.

117 posted on 09/12/2009 7:57:42 PM PDT by TradicalRC (Go here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2326276/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: papertyger

“It can not be that clear. You don’t seem to be able to distinguish between the individual and the Church.

It’s very clear. If a priest, or in the case of a
protestant church, whatever they call them, is sexually
immoral, they should no longer serve in that position.

The church authority should remove them. If they aren’t
willing to hold to and enforce God’s commandments, they
are no longer a church.

ampu


118 posted on 09/12/2009 8:11:38 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

Comment #119 Removed by Moderator

To: aMorePerfectUnion

Your own personal interpretation of the Bible that is.


120 posted on 09/12/2009 8:16:00 PM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-143 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson