To: Petronski
I'm just at a loss as to why I would take guidance on the New Testament from someone who doesn't believe it.I'm at a loss as to why a religion would call classify a book as its "scripture" and then insist it contains errors. Maybe you guys should just jettison the Hebrew Bible? That would be better than claiming that G-d can't tell the truth.
238 posted on
09/07/2009 1:20:52 PM PDT by
Zionist Conspirator
(Hanistarot leHaShem 'Eloqeynu; vehaniglot lanu ulevaneynu `ad-`olam la`asot 'et-kol-divrey HaTorah)
To: Zionist Conspirator
I'm at a loss as to why a religion would call classify a book as its "scripture" and then insist it contains errors. The Catholic Church does not do that.
You are conflating non-literal interpretation with a declaration of errors.
239 posted on
09/07/2009 1:23:19 PM PDT by
Petronski
(In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
To: Zionist Conspirator
The Catholic Church interprets some portions of the Old Testament in non-literal terms. The days in Genesis, for instance, probably represent individual phases of creation rather than literal 24 hour periods.
You do a lot of crowing about how that somehow means the Catholic Church rejects portions of the Old Testament.
Yet I’m pretty sure you reject ALL of the New Testament.
The irony is creamy and delicious, like a fine mousse au chocolat.
242 posted on
09/07/2009 1:30:21 PM PDT by
Petronski
(In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson