Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Zionist Conspirator

The Catholic Church interprets some portions of the Old Testament in non-literal terms. The days in Genesis, for instance, probably represent individual phases of creation rather than literal 24 hour periods.

You do a lot of crowing about how that somehow means the Catholic Church rejects portions of the Old Testament.

Yet I’m pretty sure you reject ALL of the New Testament.

The irony is creamy and delicious, like a fine mousse au chocolat.


242 posted on 09/07/2009 1:30:21 PM PDT by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies ]


To: Petronski
The Catholic Church interprets some portions of the Old Testament in non-literal terms.

Yeah, especially the messianic prophecies.

The days in Genesis, for instance, probably represent individual phases of creation rather than literal 24 hour periods.

And we know this because "science" tells us that the formation of the world came about purely naturally, and thus took zillions and zillions of years. Therefore, since Genesis contradicts "science," it doesn't mean what it says. However, if a scientist very logically concludes that the "consecrated host" isn't literally the flesh and blood of J*sus, Catholics have tantrum. Why is it "science" may sit in judgment on Jewish scriptures but not chr*stian ones?

You do a lot of crowing about how that somehow means the Catholic Church rejects portions of the Old Testament.

And it has decided that Darwin and Wellhausen are authoritative on these matters and chosen to follow them.

Yet I’m pretty sure you reject ALL of the New Testament.

The irony is creamy and delicious, like a fine mousse au chocolat.

Not really, since I don't claim to honor the "new testament" as scripture. You claim to recognize Genesis as scripture, yet allow "science" to sit in judgment on it. Yet you refuse to let science sit in judgment on your "new testament!" Seems to me the irony is all on your part.

245 posted on 09/07/2009 1:39:04 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (Hanistarot leHaShem 'Eloqeynu; vehaniglot lanu ulevaneynu `ad-`olam la`asot 'et-kol-divrey HaTorah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]

To: Petronski
The Catholic Church interprets some portions of the Old Testament in non-literal terms. The days in Genesis, for instance, probably represent individual phases of creation rather than literal 24 hour periods.

'Probably' does not denote an interpretation...It denotes a rejection of what was said by God...

The days in Genesis DO represent individual phases of creation...And God says those phases are days...And He even goes to to trouble of telling you what a day is...

You're not interpreting when you say God 'probably' means something else...You're rejecting...

305 posted on 09/07/2009 4:58:08 PM PDT by Iscool (I don't understand all that I know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson