Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bauckham: The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony
The Sacred Page ^ | 8/23/09 | Michael Barber

Posted on 08/29/2009 6:31:30 PM PDT by Unam Sanctam

While I do not agree with everything Richard Bauckham argues for in his book Jesus and the Eyewitnesses, I wholeheartedly agree with his fundamental premise: the Gospels are not the product of a long process of anonymous traditioning (as the Form-Critical model suggested). In this awesome video, Bauckham lays out a summary of his thought:

http://www.thesacredpage.com/2009/08/bauckham-gospels-as-eyewitness.html


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Mainline Protestant; Orthodox Christian
KEYWORDS:
Richard Bauckham's book, "Jesus and the Eyewitnesses" is a great read showing that there are reasonable arguments for the proposition that the Gospel accounts were intended to show real history and were not simply pious legends handed down long after the fact.
1 posted on 08/29/2009 6:31:30 PM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam
Also coming soon:

Dean L. Overman: "A Case for the Divinity of Jesus: Examining the Earliest Evidence"

Product Description

Whether Jesus was really the Son of God or not is a central question for Christians-and one that has provoked heated debate since the time of Jesus' birth. Dean L. Overman examines the earliest Christian records to build a compelling case for the divinity of Jesus. Addressing questions raised by books such as Bart Ehrman's Misquoting Jesus and Elaine Pagels' The Gnostic Gospels, Overman builds a carefully reasoned case for Jesus truly being the Son of God.

2 posted on 08/29/2009 7:48:04 PM PDT by Ozone34 ("There are only two philosophies: Thomism and bullshitism!" -Leon Bloy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam

btt


3 posted on 08/29/2009 8:03:15 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam

So much of Biblical scholarship has aimed to discredit the historical witness of the Church, and to deny it the authority to teach. The best way, of course, is to discredit the Scriptures themselves.


4 posted on 08/30/2009 8:30:27 AM PDT by RobbyS (ECCE HOMO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

Why would the Church, which compiled the New Testament, wish to see it discredited?

Perhaps it is only outlandish personal interpretation which needs to be discredited? Indeed, Scripture itself discredits it!


5 posted on 08/30/2009 6:40:29 PM PDT by FormerLib (Sacrificing our land and our blood cannot buy protection from jihad.-Bishop Artemije of Kosovo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib

Not the “Church” but the scholars. The scholars of the 18th Century felt the need to follow the intellectual fashions of the times, sort of like the leaders of Catholic colleges such as Notre Dame in the late ‘60s felt the need to distance themselves from the Church in order to make their reputation with the elite schools. I mean how could the school be take seriously if it really taught Christianity as true?


6 posted on 08/30/2009 9:33:14 PM PDT by RobbyS (ECCE HOMO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson