You wrote:
“I doubt that.[that Jesus loves ZC]”
I don’t doubt that Jesus loves ZC for a single second.
“Is there a “Catholic bible” in existence that contains traditional commentary from fathers or doctors of the church rather than “modern scholarship?” I doubt it.”
You need to stop doubting.
Haydock DRV: http://www.catholictreasures.com/cartdescrip/11341.html?gclid=CJm9j5P07psCFSQeDQodj1cKAA
The notes, by the way, are online here: http://haydock1859.tripod.com/
And there’s always this new DRV: http://www.tanbooks.com/news/holy-bible-douay-rheims.htm
Both of these Bibles are currently in print. The TAN DRV Bible is due to be released soon.
There’s also this: http://www.baroniuspress.com/category.php?wid=58&cid=1
My point is that the article at the top of this thread--an article on how Catholics are supposed to read the Bible--is committed to "modern scholarship" which replaces traditional commentaries with blasphemies by Wellhausen and his followers.