Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Tennessee Nana; Texas Fossil

TN: It would appear that he is referencing the burning at the stake of a masonic knight Jacques DeMolay and some of his fellow Knights Templar in response and compliance with a papal request. Phillip the Fair of France was an outstanding monarch. His daughter Isabella married Longshanks’ lavender son Edward II in an attempt at uniting dynasties which turned out disastrously because of Edward II’s faggotry. Isabella went back to France became involved with a French knight and then returned to dismember Edward II alive. You can bet that it was the French knight who sired Edward III by Isabella and not lavender Edward II. If so, Edward III was guilty of patricide for ordering the execution of that knight after Edward III attained the age when he could be crowned king.


96 posted on 06/20/2009 12:22:46 AM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: BlackElk

Accoding to the movie Brave Heart, it was William Wallace who sired Edwaqrd III...

and Edward Wallace who was dismembered...

But I know a little of the Knights Templar...

From what I’ve read they were the good guys...

I doubt if Ed III would have known it was his father...

Isabella would never have told...


99 posted on 06/20/2009 4:06:57 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

To: BlackElk
masonic knight Jacques DeMolay

DeMolay was not a mason.

Phillip the Fair of France was an outstanding monarch.

Support to that statement would depend upon who's perspective you were viewing from.

Edward II’s faggotry.

Fact.

dismember Edward II alive.

The version I have hear is that he was killed by some of his own ruling class, and no mention of dismemberment, but mention of the use of a hot poker.

I have no knowledge of Edward III lineage or what type of ruler he was.

My whole point in posting is to show my contempt for "royalty", and to imply that this attitude was possibly why the Huguenots were persecuted. They were a threat to the "rulers" power.

Respectfully

101 posted on 06/20/2009 4:36:20 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (Once a Republic, Now a State, Still Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson