Posted on 05/29/2009 10:31:32 AM PDT by NYer
See my post #20
OMG! Is that a NOOSE in the right hand corner of the picture?!!!!
So.... Is she Episcopalian? Anglican? AME?
She can’t be in communion with Rome and still be validly ordained if this is actually female - Roman Catholic isn’t an option.
Well, at least she knows the word she is trying to be. Most of these folks claim to be “woman priests”, which is as just as possible as a “man priestess”. But the Church doesn’t have priestesses or “woman priests” so she is outta luck anyhow.
Freegards, thanks for all the pings
Traditional marriage is a part of the Natural Law. One does not have to be a Catholic to oppose it. One can be an atheist, a Muslim, a pagan priestess, a Dalai Lama, even a delusionally self-styled “Roman Catholic Priestess”, and oppose gay “marriage”. Kudos to that woman for that.
Barking moonbat Bump.
Yeah, that is weird. You would kinda expect someone calling themselves a “priestess” to be calling for more babies to be butchered or something not traditional marriage!! Like you said, good for her.
Freegards
it all makes sense to me now....she told them she was a Catholic Priestess and the Secret Service guys decided she was nuts and hauled her off.
What the heck is a Roman Catholic Priestess?
Is that the same thing as a Jewish Gay Baal Worshiper?
*Just for the record, I know there’s no such animal.
They (secret service) screwed up.
Why didn’t they send her to the funny farm?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.