[metmom]

Millions of practitioners across 200 years with billions of supporting artifacts — how much more “genuine science” do you need?

Millions of practitioners of what? Evolution? Got any stats to back up that there have been millions of practitioners of evolution/Darwinism?

And 200 years for something that has been a theory since 1859 when Darwin published Origin of the Species?

I hope you do science better than you add or subtract.

[freedumb2003]

>>Millions of practitioners of what? Evolution? Got any stats to back up that there have been millions of practitioners of evolution/Darwinism?<<

Well, lets look at the numbers. At any given moment there are billions of people on the planet. There are apx. 13 million scientists in the US right now, and you can certainly determine that if even 10% are involved in anthropology that makes it millions in the USA alone. Add to that the number of practitioners across the world and we certainly easily exceed millions.

>>And 200 years for something that has been a theory since 1859 when Darwin published Origin of the Species?<<

Yes — as anyone who knows science knows, a Scientific Theory is the highest and most respected concept in science.

>>I hope you do science better than you add or subtract. <<

And I hope your math skills exceed your argumentation skills. Else I am afraid you will lose your home.

[count-your-change]

Billions of artifacts? Yes, there is, like the Burgess Shale, but they contradict Darwinism instead of support it.

sighhh.

[WondrousCreation]

I hope you do science better than you add or subtract.

As has been demonstrated time and time again on FR, science isn't exactly the strong point of evos.

I blame the gubmint skools, and their own hardened hearts.