Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Galileo: The Trump Card of Catholic Urban Legends
Pittsburgh Catholic ^ | 5/15/09 | Robert P. Lockwood

Posted on 05/18/2009 9:12:37 PM PDT by bdeaner

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-153 next last
To: bdeaner

and most who are in Galileo’s cheering section don’t know the first thing about planetary physics.

they claim that the sun is stationary. FALSE
they claim that the planets revolve in circles around the sun. FALSE.

they have no idea what parallax is.


21 posted on 05/18/2009 10:35:00 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dr_lew

Hey, if you’re going to quote from a book, use quotation marks. The first sentence from your post — the one that begins “Galileo was ordered to kneel down...” — is Fantoli’s (via Coyne’s translation), not yours.

>>> BTW, you will find nothing in this work resembling the revisionism of the posted article. <<<

Actually, you will find quite a bit of Fantoli’s book to be in accord with the posted article. Both try to arrive at an historical account of what happened in 1616 and 1633 without regurgitating the usual “warfare of science with theology” myth. Fantoli just presents ALL of the historical context — with footnotes!

Have you read either one?


22 posted on 05/18/2009 10:36:59 PM PDT by Poe White Trash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bdeaner
They didn't arrest and put Copernicus on house arrest, did they? No. Why? Because he didn't overstep political bounds in the way Galileo did.

Yeah, he stayed in bounds by delaying the publication of his thesis until the year of his death in 1543, and even then it was only the urging of others that overcame his reticence.

Galileo was born in 1564, and Giordano Bruno was burned at the stake in 1600, Galileo's 36th year. Wouldn't that have scared him? No ... he was playing the game, which Bruno had refused to do.

23 posted on 05/18/2009 10:39:35 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dr_lew

Bruno was not executed for his science. He was executed for his heretical religious beliefs about the Trinity, the divinity and incarnation of christ, the transubstantiation, the virginity of Mary etc. He was a pantheist. That’s why he was condemned.


24 posted on 05/18/2009 10:46:31 PM PDT by bdeaner (The bread which we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ? (1 Cor. 10:16))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

Brown and Howard? Silly tripe for women and nothing more.

And you seem to get your information from uneducated people who literally have never studied the history of Government in Europe. Every government in Europe was a type of monarchy. Take a trip to Germany sometime for example, or France. Look at how the prince electors, kings, etc lived in their spendor. Note the dates. Note when the temporal governments were finally free from Vatican control.

Surely you dont argue that the vatican did not exercise the power to imprison back then? A Christian chiurch only gets this by falling into error. It doesnt come from Jesus, thats for sure.

I deeply admire anyone defending todays church. But some well-meaning, but clearly overzealous people, seem to think that defending the church today, means trying to justify anything they did back then.


25 posted on 05/18/2009 10:47:08 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs earn the title of "man's best friend", Muslims hate dogs,,add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dr_lew

Thats what my understanding of his building of his telescope was too.


26 posted on 05/18/2009 10:48:36 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs earn the title of "man's best friend", Muslims hate dogs,,add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dr_lew

>>> ...it’s revisionism. It promotes the view that the actions of the Church were consistent with a scientifically enlightened view, and that Galileo brought the whole thing upon himself with his rash agressiveness. <<<

Actually, towards the end of the article we find this:

“The mistakes that were made came from Galileo’s own personality and style, the Holy Father’s anger in believing that Galileo had personally deceived him, jealous competitive scientists out to get the acerbic Galileo and, frankly, tribunal judges who erroneously believed it was scientific fact that the universe revolved around a motionless Earth and that the Bible confirmed such a belief.”

Doesn’t look so onesided to me. Once again, have you even bothered to read the article?

>>> I think the record of his condemnation that I cited should be enough to give anyone pause. <<<

Correct. However, I think that both Bernini and Lockwood would agree that his trial and condemnation are poor fodder for “science vs. theology” myth-mongers and anti-Catholic bigots.


27 posted on 05/18/2009 10:50:50 PM PDT by Poe White Trash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dr_lew

You are distorting the facts regarding Copernicus. Long before his death, in 1533, the Vatican — Pope Clement VII and a variety of Cardinals — were lectured on Copernicus’s heliocentric view. They did not condemn him nor jail him. He was afraid of the public’s reaction, not the Vatican’s reaction. That’s why he self-censored the book.


28 posted on 05/18/2009 10:51:37 PM PDT by bdeaner (The bread which we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ? (1 Cor. 10:16))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

yeah, just governing doesn’t come from Jesus. yeah. Jesus wants the secularists to rule. yeah.


29 posted on 05/18/2009 10:52:11 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

i wanna hear Rhino explain the parallax problem that the Copernicans ran into. How exactly is it that we know that the Copernican model is correct?


30 posted on 05/18/2009 10:56:26 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: bdeaner
That's why paganism did not produce a scientific revolution -- their assumed cosmos were always chaotic due to the supposed capriciousness of the gods.

kosmos 1
I. order, kosmôi and kata kosmon in order, duly, Il., etc.; maps atar ou kata kosmon id=Il.; oudeni kosmôi in no sort of order, Hdt., attic
2. good order, good behaviour, decency, Aesch., Dem.
3. the form, fashion of a thing, Od., Hdt.
4. of states, order, government, Hdt., Thuc.

The recognition that Thomas is fundamentally an Aristotelian is not equivalent to the claim that Aristotle is the only influence on him. It is the claim that whatever Thomas takes on from other sources is held to be compatible with what he already holds in common with Aristotle.

- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Saint Thomas Aquinas

31 posted on 05/18/2009 10:56:32 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
But some well-meaning, but clearly overzealous people, seem to think that defending the church today, means trying to justify anything they did back then.

The main problem is that you seem to misunderstand the point of the article. The point of the article is not to justify what the Church did. IT DOES NOT JUSTIFY. The point is that the Church was not, and is not, fundamentally anti-science, as it is typically protrayed to be (like in the stupid movie based on the Brown book). Never was, never will be. And that is not revisionist history. Science as we know it did not emerge in ANY OTHER culture than the one laid down by Christianity. That's not just a coincidence. Think about it.
32 posted on 05/18/2009 10:58:15 PM PDT by bdeaner (The bread which we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ? (1 Cor. 10:16))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: chase19

“a misunderstanding about what Galileo was and was not permitted to say in his 1632 work” (permitted?)

And the result was house imprisonment for life.

Youre right, im wrong. Thats clearly what Jesus advocated doing to anyone who questioned him. Just like when Thomas asked to see the nail scars,,, No wait, thats a bad example, ill dig around some more. Im mystified how you defend these absolute dictators.


33 posted on 05/18/2009 10:58:41 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs earn the title of "man's best friend", Muslims hate dogs,,add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: bdeaner

bump


34 posted on 05/18/2009 10:59:47 PM PDT by Captain Beyond (The Hammer of the gods! (Just a cool line from a Led Zep song))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dr_lew

Aristotle was not a pagan! Nor did His work produce a scientific revolution; it did not fully realize itself until it became integrated with the Christian worldview.


35 posted on 05/18/2009 11:00:56 PM PDT by bdeaner (The bread which we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ? (1 Cor. 10:16))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: bdeaner

“They didn’t arrest and put Copernicus on house arrest, did they?”

That* is the point. Who in the hell is the Pope to have anybody ARRESTED?


36 posted on 05/18/2009 11:01:08 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs earn the title of "man's best friend", Muslims hate dogs,,add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
That* is the point. Who in the hell is the Pope to have anybody ARRESTED?

That's YOUR point. Not the point of the article. The point of the article is to say that the Catholic Church is not, never has been, anti-science -- even in the extreme case of Galileo. Period. The article is NOT making the argument that the Pople should be able to arrest people! That's ridiculous. We all agree that freedom of religion is a more enlightened principle. That's not the topic of the article. Ok?
37 posted on 05/18/2009 11:06:23 PM PDT by bdeaner (The bread which we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ? (1 Cor. 10:16))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT

Guess thats why Jesus tried to sieze the government in Jerusalem. And why he told Peter to set up a government complete with arrest powers. Now what chapter and verse was that again???


38 posted on 05/18/2009 11:07:16 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs earn the title of "man's best friend", Muslims hate dogs,,add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: bdeaner

“Bruno was not executed for his science. He was executed for his heretical religious beliefs about the Trinity”

OHHHH,, well thats better! Like Jesus said,, if you find a nonbeliever, murder him.


39 posted on 05/18/2009 11:10:16 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs earn the title of "man's best friend", Muslims hate dogs,,add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

y’all should list to Rhino. Jesus wants us to live like flower children. But, Rhino, flower children aren’t on the internet at 2 a.m.

“on earth as it is in heaven.” There may be authority in heaven, but have none on earth. Our kingdom is not of this world. Does that explain your cause, Desert?


40 posted on 05/18/2009 11:10:31 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-153 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson