Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Story of the Church (RLDS or The Community of Christ) LDS (OPEN)
Centerpiece.org ^ | Inez Smith Davis

Posted on 05/07/2009 8:02:59 AM PDT by greyfoxx39

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
 The Reorganized Church of Latter Day Saints
or
(The Community of Christ as it is now known)

Formerly known as Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, this denomination regards itself a reorganization of the church organized in 1830 by Joseph Smith, Jr., and regards Joseph Smith III, the eldest surviving son of Smith Jr., to have been his legitimate successor. The church was "legally organized on April 6, 1830, in Fayette, New York"[16]. The formal reorganization occurred on April 6, 1860 in Amboy, Illinois as the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, adding the word Reorganized to the church name in 1872.

Community of Christ today considers the period from 1830 to 1844 to be a part of its early history and from 1844, the year of the death of the founder, to 1860, to be a period of disorganization. Since 1844 the doctrines and practices of Community of Christ have evolved separately from the other denominations of the Latter Day Saint movement.[17] Within the past several decades, the church has undergone radical changes, discarding many of its distinctive doctrines. Some changes included the ordination of women to priesthood, open communion, and changing the church's commonly-used name from Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints to the current name in April 2001.[18]

The church owns two temples, the Kirtland Temple dedicated in 1836 in Kirtland, Ohio, (operated in part as a historic site as part of its educational ministry), and the relatively new Independence Temple, which serves as the church's headquarters in Independence. The church sponsors Graceland University with a campus in Lamoni, Iowa, and another in Independence, where the School of Nursing and Community of Christ Seminary is based. These structures are open to the public and used for education and gatherings. The church also owns and operates some Latter Day Saint historic sites in Far West, Missouri; Lamoni, Iowa; and Plano and Nauvoo, Illinois. The Auditorium in Independence, Missouri, houses the Children's Peace Pavilion and is the site of the major legislative assembly of Community of Christ, known as World Conference.

(Emma Hale Smith Bidamon (10 July 180430 April 1879) was married to Joseph Smith, Jr. until his death in 1844, and was an early leader of the Latter Day Saint movement, both during his life and afterward as a member of the Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (RLDS, now the Community of Christ). )

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emma_Hale_Smith_Bidamon


1 posted on 05/07/2009 8:03:00 AM PDT by greyfoxx39
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: colorcountry; Colofornian; Elsie; FastCoyote; svcw; Zakeet; SkyPilot; rightazrain; ...

Ping to first in a series on the division between the Salt Lake City LDS and the Reorganized LDS.


2 posted on 05/07/2009 8:06:12 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Obama....never saw a Bush molehill he couldn't make a mountain out of.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39
Open threads are a town square. Antagonism though not encouraged, should be expected

Posters may argue for or against beliefs of any kind. They may tear down other’s beliefs. They may ridicule.

On all threads, but particularly “open” threads, posters must never “make it personal.” Reading minds and attributing motives are forms of “making it personal.” Making a thread “about” another Freeper is “making it personal.”

When in doubt, review your use of the pronoun “you” before hitting “enter.”

Like the Smoky Backroom, the conversation may be offensive to some.

Thin-skinned posters will be booted from “open” threads because in the town square, they are the disrupters.

http://www.freerepublic.com/~religionmoderator/

 Thin-skinned (emotional, whiney or mercurial temper) posters are the disruptors on open threads.

3 posted on 05/07/2009 8:07:12 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Obama....never saw a Bush molehill he couldn't make a mountain out of.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

Honest question. Why would anyone join a church that was formed 1800 years removed from the time of Christ? Wouldn’t that be akin to saying that God left us orphans until 1830 after promising to never leaving us orphans? Didn’t scripture tell us that He was building his Church while he was still on earth, and the gates of hell would not prevail against it? How is it that this is compatible?


4 posted on 05/07/2009 8:07:20 AM PDT by wombtotomb (ITS NOT ABOUT RIGHT VS. LEFT, ITS ABOUT RIGHT VS. WRONG!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

Because the mormon god told them to, her RLDS gave full membership and the priesthood to black men in 1865...

Why did it take untril 1978 for the break off branch, the LDS, to catch up and do the same ????


5 posted on 05/07/2009 8:15:12 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wombtotomb

Logic logic logic.........


6 posted on 05/07/2009 8:21:52 AM PDT by svcw (There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who know binary and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wombtotomb
Honest question.

Honest answer.

From the time of Christ's death, onward until the plates were discovered, a time of Apostacy was rampant on earth. The Church became ran by men, and not of the will of God.

"Let no one in any way deceive you, for it [Jesus' return] will not come unless the apostasy comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction," (2 Thess. 2:3, NASB).

The LDS faith believes that Joseph Smith was called as a prophet, and was given the Golden plates to translate. These plates contained the written records of Prophets who lived here, and tells of wars, miracles and teachings that supplement (not REPLACE) the bible.

The Bible, as generally accepted now, is a compilation of books that were first assembled by the First Council of Nicea. This council of people determined which scriptures would be compiled into the bible, and which scriptures would be discarded.

It is very intersting that the Dead Sea Scrolls, just recently discovered (historically speaking, recent is ~50 yrs) tend to give credence to the Book of Mormon over the Bible in points of contention. For this, I leave you to investigate for yourself. Research for yourself, and let your own soul determine the falicy or the correctness of the Book of Mormon.

7 posted on 05/07/2009 8:26:24 AM PDT by Hodar (Who needs laws .... when this "feels" so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wombtotomb
Mormon belief is that Christ's gospel was removed from the earth and "restored" by Joseph Smith:

His gospel was first established on the earth beginning with Adam and has been taught in every dispensation through such prophets as Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Moses, and others. Each of these prophets foretold the coming of Jesus Christ to atone for the sins of the world. Those prophecies have been fulfilled. The Savior did establish His Church. He called His Apostles and established His priesthood. Most importantly, He laid down His life and took it up that all will rise again, thus carrying out the atoning sacrifice. But that was not the end.

After the Savior’s Resurrection, He commissioned His Apostles to lead the Church and administer gospel ordinances. Faithful to this charge, they were persecuted, and some were eventually martyred. As a result, the Lord’s priesthood authority was no longer on earth, and the world fell into spiritual darkness. In the centuries that followed, God’s children had the Light of Christ, could pray, and could feel the influence of the Holy Ghost. But the fulness of the gospel had been lost. There was no one left on earth with the power and authority to lead the Church or perform sacred ordinances such as baptism, conferral of the gift of the Holy Ghost, and the saving ordinances of the temple. Almost everyone was denied access to the scriptures, and most people were illiterate.

Preparations for the (LDS) Restoration and the Second Coming

The Restoration of Major Doctrines through Joseph Smith-Part One

The Restoration of Major Doctrines through Joseph Smith: Part Two

8 posted on 05/07/2009 8:27:50 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Obama....never saw a Bush molehill he couldn't make a mountain out of.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
It is very intersting that the Dead Sea Scrolls, just recently discovered (historically speaking, recent is ~50 yrs) tend to give credence to the Book of Mormon over the Bible in points of contention. For this, I leave you to investigate for yourself. Research for yourself, and let your own soul determine the falicy or the correctness of the Book of Mormon.

What? Are you able to point to the research? (not lds writings)

9 posted on 05/07/2009 8:28:34 AM PDT by svcw (There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who know binary and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wombtotomb
From the LDS perspective, the church disappeared after St. Paul and did not reappear (restored) until Smith. That is the reason that they baptize for the dead (proxy baptism). Of course, there is no way to prove any of this. You simply have to trust what Smith says. So far, everything that he claimed that could be supported by empirical or historical evidence has been proven false. For instance, there is no such thing Reformed Egyptian, and the Indians are a completely different race than the Israelites, so they could not possibly be the lost tribes of Israel. These are just a few of many examples that someone could give to at least question the reliability of Smith's visions. Not only that, but there are major conflicts in their belief system that are contrary to Scripture, that it is not a restored Christianity but something essentially new. You ask why someone could believe the teachings of the Mormon faith? The god of this world has blinded them to the truth. They do not test the spririts.
10 posted on 05/07/2009 8:30:33 AM PDT by Nosterrex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
The Bible, as generally accepted now, is a compilation of books that were first assembled by the First Council of Nicea. This council of people determined which scriptures would be compiled into the bible, and which scriptures would be discarded. It is very intersting that the Dead Sea Scrolls, just recently discovered (historically speaking, recent is ~50 yrs) tend to give credence to the Book of Mormon over the Bible in points of contention. For this, I leave you to investigate for yourself. Research for yourself, and let your own soul determine the falicy or the correctness of the Book of Mormon.

GRoooaaaaan!

Obviously this is the rendition of facts as told to you by the LDS Church. Really Hodar, perhaps you should read historical facts from another source.

Bible Timeline or.....

How We Got our Bible... or perhaps you could just google bible, canon, timeline and see what truths you can come up with.

11 posted on 05/07/2009 8:37:49 AM PDT by colorcountry (A faith without truth is not true faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
From the time of Christ's death, onward until the plates were discovered, a time of Apostacy was rampant on earth.

So Christ lied when he told his disciples that he would send the Holy Spirit, who would lead them to "all truth"?

And he lied again when he said "behold, I am with you always, even unto the consummation of the age"?

Why would you follow a weak, impotent "Savior" like that, who founded a church which fell apart within decades after his ascension?

BTW, the word is "apostasy," not "apostacy". And the passage you quote says nothing about any 1800 year apostasy.

12 posted on 05/07/2009 8:40:09 AM PDT by Campion ("President Barack Obama" is an anagram for "An Arab-backed Imposter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39
I retired to a secret place in a grove and began to call upon the Lord; while fervently engaged in supplication, my mind was taken away from the objects with which I was surrounded, and I was enwrapped in a heavenly vision and saw two glorious personages who exactly resembled each other in features and likeness, surrounded with a brilliant light which eclipsed the sun at noonday.

2Cr 11:13 "For such [are] false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works."

They told me that all religious denominations were believing in incorrect doctrines, and that none of them were acknowledged of God as his church and kingdom. And I was expressly commanded to 'go not after them,'

Contradicts Mat 16:18 :
"And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it."

at the same time receiving a promise that the fullness of the gospel should at some future time be made known unto me.

"fullness of the gospel" here implies "truth of the gospel".
Is "fullness of the gospel" even in the bible? lets see...

Rom 15:29 "But I know that when I come to you, I shall come in the fullness of the blessing of the gospel of Christ."

Hmmm... thats not it... thats fullness of blessings of the gospel. That means something else... and I could not find "fullness of the gospel" ANYWHERE in any of the other translations.

So what does "fullness of the gospel" mean if it is not an indictment against the bible itself as not being complete or fully truthful?
13 posted on 05/07/2009 8:41:27 AM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: svcw
What? Are you able to point to the research? (not lds writings)

Just a curiosity, who is going to compare the Book of Mormon to the Dead Sea Scrolls, if not the LDS faith? The Dead Sea Scrolls were suppressed by various church affiliated groups for over 20 years, primarily because there were some fundamental disagreements with what the scrolls said.

For some reason, the LDS faith has found that points of scriptures that were condemned by 'modern churches' were in fact, supported by the Dead Sea Scrolls.

Link

14 posted on 05/07/2009 8:46:06 AM PDT by Hodar (Who needs laws .... when this "feels" so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hodar

The reason I ask the question that way, is because I have seen dozens of shows on archeology that have said this find supports (usually phrased, “this find supports the Biblical account”) the Bible / Torah. If in fact they found support for the bm it wouldn’t be noted?


15 posted on 05/07/2009 8:49:45 AM PDT by svcw (There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who know binary and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: svcw
I have seen dozens of shows on archeology that have said this find supports (usually phrased, “this find supports the Biblical account”) the Bible / Torah.

The findings supported ancient Hebrew writings, that were not present in the bible. But then the question becomes, how did a 2nd grade educated farmer in the 18th century, with no access to ancient Hebrew doctrines, know about this? Pretty lucky, huh?

16 posted on 05/07/2009 8:53:44 AM PDT by Hodar (Who needs laws .... when this "feels" so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns
So what does "fullness of the gospel" mean if it is not an indictment against the bible itself as not being complete or fully truthful?

From LDS.org

"In its fulness, the gospel includes all the doctrines, principles, laws, ordinances, and covenants necessary for us to be exalted in the celestial kingdom. The Savior has promised that if we endure to the end, faithfully living the gospel, He will hold us guiltless before the Father at the Final Judgment (see 3 Nephi 27:16).

3 Nephi 27:16 "And it shall come to pass, that whoso repenteth and is baptized in my name shall be filled; and if he endureth to the end, behold, him will I hold guiltless before my Father at that day when I shall stand to judge the world." Link

17 posted on 05/07/2009 8:54:37 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Obama....never saw a Bush molehill he couldn't make a mountain out of.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
I would say luck had nothing to do with it. Even demons can quote scripture.
18 posted on 05/07/2009 8:56:01 AM PDT by svcw (There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who know binary and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Hodar

(Who needs the Bible .... when this Book of Mormon “feels” so right?)


19 posted on 05/07/2009 8:56:03 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
The Dead Sea Scrolls were suppressed by various church affiliated groups for over 20 years, primarily because there were some fundamental disagreements with what the scrolls said.

Be specific. Everything except cave 4 was published very rapidly. Cave 4 was kept secret by one group of Catholic scholars. It is now public. There are no "fundamental disagreements" with any of it.

OTOH, the DSS includes a virtually perfect copy of Isaiah, which is nearly identical to the modern Hebrew text.

Isaiah (around chapter 44) says 4 or 5 times in different ways that there is only one God. Not as many gods as there grains of sand on the seashore, not a "god of this world," but one god. Period.

That's in "fundamental disagreement" with LDS doctrine.

It also shows the falsehood of the LDS claim that "translation errors" were introduced into the Bible by "priestcraft".

20 posted on 05/07/2009 8:58:27 AM PDT by Campion ("President Barack Obama" is an anagram for "An Arab-backed Imposter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson