Rubbish & lies. Just more premise-based “research” with unsupported assumption after assumption attempting to reduce people to little more than pondscum in their eyes. It’s fully intentional, and they have been pulling this kind of stunt for years. This is NOT what the experiment really showed, this is their narrow interpretation of it.
I didn’t grasp all the details of the experiment, nor the testing performed. Is there a publicly available publication of their efforts?
Then why don’t you write a paper refuting this interpretation, and submit it for peer-review?
I am sure you have all the falsifiable evidence to support your assertion.