Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/09/2009 10:33:19 AM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; nickcarraway; Romulus; ...

First came the feminists, followed by the gays. Throughout ancient history, when these two groups rose into positions of power, society collapsed.


2 posted on 03/09/2009 10:34:47 AM PDT by NYer ("Run from places of sin as from a plague." - St. John Climacus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

If the parishes are private property how can the state transfer them to ‘the people’?


3 posted on 03/09/2009 10:35:41 AM PDT by truemiester ((If the U.S. should fail, a veil of darkness will come over the Earth for a thousand years))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

The Connecticut legislators who introduced this don’t think they will lose any Catholic support taking on the authority of the Catholic Church.

That is a stunning assertion. Anyone else thing that’s true? This isn’t an attack only on the Catholic Church. It’s an attack on the Constitution and every non-governmental association. It is the most blatantly anti-American usurpation if citizens rights I have ever seen. These sponsors need to be driven into a hole not only by Catholics but by EVERY American.


4 posted on 03/09/2009 10:38:53 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

This will hit not just the Roman Catholic Church, it will his all Denominations where church property is owned by an extra-parish juridical authority — like the Episcopal Church and the United Methodist Church.

In the end, it will fail. It is a direct violation of the 1st Amendment. Attempts have been made to circumvent it before — particularly in the UMC — and the case history is entirely against this kind of intrusion.


5 posted on 03/09/2009 10:39:42 AM PDT by TexasGreg ("Democrats Piss Me Off")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

PS. A friend who just read this post called to say that if the state of Connecticut wants to transfer ownership of the diocese and all the parishes to the laypeople, the state has to pay a fair price to compensate the bishops in the dioceses which own all its assets.

THAT’S JUST WHAT THEY WANT. Especially THE HOSPITALS.


6 posted on 03/09/2009 10:40:12 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

e-mail the sponsors
 
State Sen. Andrew McDonald  (800-842-1420 or McDonald@senatedems.ct.gov,  

State Rep. Michael Lawlor (800-842-8267 or
MLawlor99@juno.com
 
Legislative Attack on Catholic Church in Connecticut (Bishop Speaks: "Diocese of Bridgeport" Link


12 posted on 03/09/2009 12:56:28 PM PDT by Coleus (Abortion, Euthanasia & FOCA - - don't Obama and the Democrats just kill ya!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
http://cga.ct.gov/2009/TOB/S/2009SB-01098-R00-SB.htm

13 posted on 03/09/2009 1:11:50 PM PDT by Coleus (Abortion, Euthanasia & FOCA - - don't Obama and the Democrats just kill ya!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

I don’t think it says “Constitution State” on the license plates anymore, either.


14 posted on 03/09/2009 1:47:08 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (To Let)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lightman

Possible Lutheran ping for your list.


17 posted on 03/09/2009 5:09:51 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
Hm.

This is nothing more or less than a state government taking a partisan role in a church matter. The CT legislators apparently don't like the Catholic Church, and are prepared to act on that basis.

Those of you who think this is a great idea (from an Anglican standpoint) had better think again. A little reading-up on the background of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment should bring you back to earth.

The interference of state or national government in the governance of a church is not a good thing.

24 posted on 03/10/2009 6:33:25 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer; informavoracious; larose; RJR_fan; Prospero; Conservative Vermont Vet; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.

Obama Says A Baby Is A Punishment

Obama: “If they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby.”

25 posted on 03/10/2009 6:35:58 AM PDT by narses (http://www.theobamadisaster.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

Is there any word from the Vatican about this?


26 posted on 03/10/2009 6:51:19 AM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
PS. A friend who just read this post called to say that if the state of Connecticut wants to transfer ownership of the diocese and all the parishes to the laypeople, the state has to pay a fair price to compensate the bishops in the dioceses which own all its assets.

Why bother?

After the Kilo decision they can say their use to convert it into a disco or something, that has a greater tax revenue stream for the city or township, and just take it....

30 posted on 03/10/2009 11:08:14 AM PDT by taildragger (Palin / Mulally 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

2 oxes to gore with one bull...The Catholic church and the constitution.


31 posted on 03/10/2009 1:25:42 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (TAZ:Untamed, Unpredictable, Uninhibited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson