Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Public Comment on Removing Conscience Protections for Health Care Workers
LifeSite News ^ | March 9, 2009 | Magdalene

Posted on 03/09/2009 9:35:47 AM PDT by magdalen

Public Comment on Removing Conscience Protections for Health Care Workers

By John-Henry Westen

WASHINGTON, March 6, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - President Obama's proposal to rescind a policy that protects the conscience rights of health care workers has now been formally published in the Federal Register, thus opening the 30-day period available for public comment on the proposal. Pro-life groups in the United States are urging concerned citizens to voice their concerns.

The policy, one of the last acts of the Bush Administration, protects health care workers from being forced to perform and provide controversial services that conflict with their personal, moral and religious beliefs.

Comments may be submitted by email at proposedrescission@hhs.gov

According to the Proposed Rule comments should provide the following:

"1. Information, including specific examples where feasible, addressing the scope and nature of the problems giving rise to the need for federal rulemaking and how the current rule would resolve those problems.

"2. Information, including specific examples where feasible, supporting or refuting allegations that the December 19, 2008 final rule reduces access to information and health care services, particularly by low- income women.

"3. Comment on whether the December 19, 2008 final rule provides sufficient clarity to minimize the potential for harm resulting from any ambiguity and confusion that may exist because of the rule; and

"4. Comment on whether the objectives of the December 19, 2008 final rule might also be accomplished through non-regulatory means, such as outreach and education."


TOPICS: Current Events; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics; Religion & Science
KEYWORDS: conscience; freedoms; healthcare; prolife

1 posted on 03/09/2009 9:35:48 AM PDT by magdalen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: magdalen

Why not just say “It’s UNCONSTITUTIONAL!”


2 posted on 03/09/2009 9:51:38 AM PDT by RebelTXRose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RebelTXRose

A poster on the Boston Herald message board said this was a good rule because they took an oath to be doctors. I suggested that the read the oath.


3 posted on 03/09/2009 9:54:48 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: magdalen

They don’t want comment. They want us to shut up while they force us to accept leftist dogma and violate our principles.


4 posted on 03/09/2009 10:20:23 AM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged (liberalism is a progressive, degenerative disease of the mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson