Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: greyfoxx39

Listen to that little weasel on the youtube recordings.

He was given an opportunity to refute any allegations of immorality, but he refused to do so. If he was really interested in correcting the record and clearing his good name, he could have done so at the appeal. But that’s not what he wanted to do.

He reenrolled in BYU — online — after all those meetings took place. He knew full well that he had no right to do so, and he knew full well that BYU wouldn’t know about those meetings unless he told them, or unless he later chose to publicize his excommunication, which he did.

As for the church disciplinary proceedings, Hardy may or may not be telling the truth. They are private and the church will not discuss them, so he can pretty much say whatever he wants without fear of anyone who was there setting the record straight.


64 posted on 03/07/2009 2:09:36 PM PST by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: lady lawyer
As for the church disciplinary proceedings, Hardy may or may not be telling the truth. They are private and the church will not discuss them, so he can pretty much say whatever he wants without fear of anyone who was there setting the record straight.

Oh, were you THERE, so you KNOW about the RECORD?????

65 posted on 03/07/2009 2:19:59 PM PST by greyfoxx39 (buckle in for 4 more years of detached, grandstanding flourish left untethered by an incurious media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: lady lawyer; SENTINEL; colorcountry; reaganaut; ejonesie22
Listen to that little weasel on the youtube recordings.

Frankly, I thought the "weasely" sounding one was Vernon Heperi.

If he was really interested in correcting the record and clearing his good name, he could have done so at the appeal. But that’s not what he wanted to do.

Well, not ALL of us "exes" have a taste for kissing the nether end of mormon leaders. We leave that to the so-called "worthy ones".

And, perhaps, he just doesn't desire to have his "name cleared" with those whose judgment includes idolizing a charlatan and womanizer. I can relate to that.

66 posted on 03/07/2009 2:33:28 PM PST by greyfoxx39 (buckle in for 4 more years of detached, grandstanding flourish left untethered by an incurious media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: lady lawyer
He was given an opportunity to refute any allegations of immorality, but he refused to do so. If he was really interested in correcting the record and clearing his good name, he could have done so at the appeal. But that’s not what he wanted to do.

Uh...

Just WHAT was he ALLEDGED to have done??


Matthew 26:62-64
 62.  Then the high priest stood up and said to Jesus, "Are you not going to answer? What is this testimony that these men are bringing against you?"
 63.  But Jesus remained silent.   The high priest said to him, "I charge you under oath by the living God: Tell us if you are the Christ,  the Son of God." 
 
 
 Mark 14:60-62
 60.  Then the high priest stood up before them and asked Jesus, "Are you not going to answer? What is this testimony that these men are bringing against you?"
 61.  But Jesus remained silent and gave no answer.   Again the high priest asked him, "Are you the Christ,  the Son of the Blessed One?" 
 
 
 Acts 8:32-33
   The eunuch was reading this passage of Scripture: "He was led like a sheep to the slaughter, and as a lamb before the shearer is silent, so he did not open his mouth.
 

126 posted on 03/08/2009 5:03:04 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson