I can show you ONE contradiction in Brother's first hand accounts, can you find IT?
You see, the authors want you to think that not giving all the facts in all accounts is contradiction, and by their standard, BY THEIR STANDARD, applied to Paul, they are saying that Paul was a false Apostle
reaganaut just take a moment and appreciate the form of the response and how cleanly it cuts around your point whilst returning seamlessly to his own all the while making it look like a direct response and without needing to provide his own supporting information.
To all of those except the ones paying close attention it almost appears perfect.
Art, a thing of beauty to behold, all in a single sentence.
In your days in the LDS I bet he would be considered a “Zen Master’ by some.
While I cannot agree with the faith of the LDS I do admire their ability of sculpting rhetoric on the fly.
It is indeed almost melodic.