Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: DelphiUser
The official JOSEPH SMITH—HISTORY is the only version Joseph felt was right, he said so. All the others, by him and people who heard him speak, he was never really happy with.

ROTFLAICGU, so he didn’t like his written version about angels, he wasn ‘t happy about his age when it happened, so he fiddled around with those facts until he got something he was happy about. You haven't even bothered to go back and read those other accounts, have you.

Dictated by Joseph, maybe that was why he liked it better. Maybe he was a better speaker than a writer, that would not be surprising in someone who had a formal education of third grade.

Right, guess that is why he couldn’t discern the difference between an angel, angels or Jesus or God between the accounts. Guess it helped his memory to say how old he was rather than write it down. That’s a lot of maybe’s DU.

Since You are the one trying to critique a book you have never read through I can understand your analogy, and I sympathize.

Say a lie often enough and someone might believe it, however DU I told you I read it – are you now calling me a liar – with your history LOL

Well, If you ant to believe that, Go ahead. I lost friends, so I don't joke about it. Do me one favor, Never forget.

I don’t forget, but that never the less matches the argument you are making here.

Godzilla, Keith Crandall is the only Source of credible opinion that has been put forth on this thread, and he is on our side having left yours after observing the evidence.

: Factually challenged again DUh. I have cited from multiple reports to show other credible opinions – so if you want to appeal to authority who’s never published his close held views of mormonism and dna in a professional journal – go right ahead. I could cite Southerton’s rebuttal to Crandall if I desired as well as post links to youtube sites countering everything Crandall may say by people equally as credible. That doesn’t change the facts – go post to the Nat’l Geo folks and see what their reply is.

Give up a losing battle or resign yourself to being that last flat earther, the believer who in opposition to all evidence just has to believe that Mormons and Mormonism is bad. We are not, and all the belief anti Mormons can muster will not change that.

LOL, all the evidence DU ROFLAICGU, I have noted at least 5 different dna study methodologies that all show native Americans originated from asia. DNA from mummies predating Nephi also shows the same thing. You hold out for the hopeful dinosaur. No, the flat earthers are mormons, all the credible evidence points to the fact that the native Americans did not originate from Hebraic/sematic peoples from the region of Israel. You are just waiting for that one evidence. Just like you are waiting for that one archaelogical find. Occam’s razor applied to the situation does not fall in mormons favor.

243 posted on 02/18/2009 4:33:18 PM PST by Godzilla (Gal 4:16 Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]


To: Godzilla

Good grief...,

It’s like trying to argue some ijit kid in his Mom’s basement...

What dumby would keep on about nutty stuff that’s so easy to refute ???


248 posted on 02/18/2009 4:59:46 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson