Posted on 02/11/2009 8:31:00 AM PST by TradicalRC
The opportunistic criticism of Pope Benedict over the SSPX controversy.
By its own tardy admission, the Vatican botched the handling of Pope Benedicts decision to lift the excommunications of four Society of St. Pius X bishops. Vatican officials failed to inform the Pope that one of those bishops, Richard Williamson, had made appalling remarks about the Holocaust. p
The episode raises many legitimate questions about the Vaticans insular mode of operation. Couldnt Vatican officials have Googled Williamsons remarks easily enough? astonished observers asked. Williamsons status as the Borat of the schismatic Catholic far-right was hardly a secret, they remark.
Sure, Vatican officials could have. But then the Vatican in recent times doesnt appear to have Googled the infamous remarks of many derelict and dubious bishopsa style of aloofness that clerics like Roger Mahony have long enjoyed.
The furor in February was rich in such ironies. Catholic dissenters on the left who dont even believe in the concept of excommunication grew furious at the Pope for lifting one. Inclusive Catholics suddenly turned exclusive. Self-appointed ecumenists who normally demand that the Pope dispense the medicine of mercy now clamored for him to withdraw it.
Playing Torquemada does not become them. For one thing, left-wing Catholic dissenters share more in common with the Williamsons than they care to realize: He downplays the significance of the Jewish Holocaust; they downplay the moral significance of the unborn holocaust. He sees Vatican II as a rupture that ruined an ancient religion; they see Vatican II as a rupture that created a new one. He disobeys the Pope, seeing him as too lax; they disobey the Pope, seeing him as too rigid.
By alternative routes, they reach the same roada road that heads out of Rome and into the sectarian byways of the world where crackpot theories abound.
That abortion-deniers would lecture the Pope, even call for his resignation over this matter, is outrageous. He made a dismaying but innocent mistake. He simply didnt know Williamsons views. But whats innocent about their abortion-denying? How many rationalizing and minimizing statements have they made about that massive loss of life? Do they plan to recant those statements? Will they apologize for the scandal caused by their dissent and disobedience?
The truth is that the flames of the flap were fed not so much by sincere shock (though that existed in some measure and some of the questions the incident triggered still deserve answers) but by ulterior ideological motives, throwing light on the usual gross opportunism at work in any papal controversy.
According to the Boston Globe, Catholic Democrats pharisaically pounced on the Popes blunder in early February.
Nearly 50 Catholic Democratic members, including US Representatives William D. Delahunt, Stephen F. Lynch, James McGovern, and Richard E. Neal of Massachusetts, signed a letter asking the pope to repudiate the remarks by Williamson, it wrote. These comments were so outrageous and so egregious it really demanded a response, Delahunt said in an interview yesterday. The moral authority of the church is important to retain, and having those statements out there was unacceptable.
The Churchs moral authority is important to retain? Really? What touching concern for it from Delahunt, a Congressman who has received a 100 percent voting rating from the National Abortion Rights Action League. One would have thought anyone could join Nancy Pelosis communion line; apparently not anymore.
Hermann Haering, an eminent liberal theologian, as German newspapers put it, opined that If the Pope wants to do some good for the Church, he should leave his job. No mandatum for Benedict!
Historian Kevin Madigan, speaking to the Boston Globe, offered that There has been a loss of confidence in the Holy Fathers judgment at the highest levels in the church, as well as in the pewsa rather confident and omniscient pronouncement from someone described as a professor of the history of Christianity at Harvard Divinity School. Also, wasnt it the highest levels of the church that failed to protect the Pope here?
An elite secularist media that could not care less about the welfare and unity of the Catholic Church has faked up a concern about them, carefully stoking the fires of opportunistic outrage in a repeat of its performance after the Popes speech at Regensburg.
Yes, the Vatican and Pope invited it all through inattention. But a sense of proportion is badly needed here before rendering judgmentand the carping chorus of Benedict critics whose own hideous denials have gone unpunished is the least equipped to provide it.
George Neumayr is editor of Catholic World Report.
All CAFETERIA Catholics that don't like the Catholic church as is can find another religion that suits their moral relativism.
You have to question any Catholic organization that used Papal and Blunder in the same sentence. Just because one doesn’t yet understand the actions of the Pope doesn’t allow one to conclude that the action was ill advised or in error.
From the title, I naturally assumed this was a Lutheran thread.
True enough. I used the title given, and I am not sure that the autor considers it a blunder.
Sorry about that. No, the author is pro-Pope. The approach of the story reminded me of McCarthy and His Enemies by William F. Buckley.
So, if “papal officials failed to inform” Benedict, how is it a “Papal Blunder?”
Ach!
Should read:
So, if Vatican officials failed to inform Benedict...
It is indeed. Many Catholics who blithely accept the likes of Mahoney in their ranks get into Gordian knots of apoplexy when any hint of charity is shown to traditionalists.
As though these traditionalists were the problem with the church rather than the dissidents within.
It is yet another sign of Catholics who have made their peace with the Spiritus Mundi and embraced the maxim of the French Revolution: "No Enemies to the Left!"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.