Posted on 01/31/2009 9:48:29 AM PST by Zakeet
Edited on 01/31/2009 11:43:32 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
Well, you use the word Mormon like the “N-Word” so, you have little right to complain.
No, Elsie, you never play defense. You don’t answer questions so, how could you?
you have little right to complain.
______________________________________________________
As an American citizen, I retain my Constitutional right to complain...
And you exercise it ad nauseum.
the word Mormon (is) like the “N-Word”
_________________________________
Well, Joe Smith chose it so blame him...
You mind read about as good as ol’ Joe Smith “read them there rocks in his hat...
Stop reading that there book of mormon...
You’ll feel better...
he didn’t just denounce them but then explained why He did it.
That would include the time that he called the Pharisees and the Sadduccees vipers and whited sepulchers. Matthew 23:33:
__________________________________
vipers and whited sepulchres would not have needed explaining in those days...
nor now...
OK, that says all that needs to be said about you. Nooooo, you don’t hate Mormons....not at all....I’m pretty sure Christ would not approve of you last statement. Just guessing.
I’m pretty sure Christ would not approve of you last statement. Just guessing.
_________________________________________
And I KNOW the Lord Jesus Christ of the Bible doesnt care...
What does He have to do with mormons and what they think ???
Mormons are not Christians...
OTOH, the opinion or “approval” of some mythical mormon “god” / New Age spirit guide named “christ” living on the planet Kolob
(Isnt that a cheap champagne ??? Joe Smith always did serve the cheap stuff at inflated prices)
is of no interest to me as a Christian...
Who is Jesus teaching - not the scribes and pharisees, but his followers and disciples. The scibes and pharisees received no teaching from Jesus in this chapter. Read a little more reggie to get the context.
They received no teaching because they chose not to. And that was part of the point Christ was making. They could have learned. It was there for them to learn. Christ was offering it to them and they rejected Him preferring to hold on to their belief that the fact that they were descendants of Abraham, this alone made them holy. His followers and disciples learned because they were willing to be taught.
I doubt even your concept of Christ would approve of what you said.
"Even when He threw out the money-changers in the temple, he didn’t just denounce them but then explained why He did it. When the Pharisees and the Sadduccees tried to trip up the Savior with their questions, what was His usual response? He cited the scriptures and explained the point of doctrine in question."
That would include the time that he called the Pharisees and the Sadduccees vipers and whited sepulchers. Matthew 23:33:
You stated Jesus would cite scriptures to them (scribes and pharisees) and explain the point of doctrine. That is entirely absent from the context of MT 23. Your reply indicates that your initial interpretation was wrong.
Whereas our REFORMED Gospel® CAN be spread by secret Temple Rites®.
--MormonDude(And, if ANY of you GENTILES even DARE to POST them; WE have the POWER to get them removed!!*)
*they're NON-scriptural you see...
That would be the AN-word.
Now even YOU are channeling Fproy!
Figures.
Yeah, dont be calling us no “chicks”
We’s “wymyn” or sumpin..
:)
This should be called “Christian” forum and not “Religion” forum. Scroll up and substitute the word
“Pope” for the words “Joseph Smith” and tell me thats something you’d tollerate. I don’t think so.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.