Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Iscool

You wrote:

“I didn’t interpret anything...”

Yeah, actually you did.

“I ‘applied’ it to your church...”

No, you tried to superimpose it on the Church, but the Church just shrugs it right off.

“And the application fits...”

No, actually it doesn’t. The Real Presence is NOT the Second Coming, nor does the glory of the Second Coming someone contradict the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist.

Go back to playing with your crayons now and maybe you’ll get ice cream after your dinner.


29 posted on 12/28/2008 11:51:04 AM PST by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: vladimir998
No, actually it doesn’t. The Real Presence is NOT the Second Coming, nor does the glory of the Second Coming someone contradict the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist.

The second coming of Jesus is biblical...A Catholic priest turning an unbroken baked wafer into Jesus Christ is NOT biblical...Therefore, the ONLY presence of Jesus Christ in our future will be the second coming of Jesus...

You guys may (or may not) be keen on your catechism but cleary the scriptures are not your forte'...All you can do is deny, and insult...

31 posted on 12/28/2008 4:11:41 PM PST by Iscool (I don't understand all that I know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: vladimir998

Don’t you just pity the sickness of heresy? Very sad.


32 posted on 12/28/2008 4:12:55 PM PST by big'ol_freeper (Gen. George S. Patton to Michael Moore... American Carol: "I really like slapping you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson