Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: BipolarBob

From that angle I should add that deliberate childlessness of a married couple is also sinful, unless a valid reason for the childlessness exists. That is true even if the couple avoids pregnancy through legitimate methods and not using contraception or self-mutilation.

The valid reasons are severe economic hardship (never an issue in America), considerable risk to the health of the mother or high probability of birth defects.

Theoretical fears of “overpopulation” — whatever that means — are not a valid reason for a married couple to avoid pregnancies.

The vocation of single life, religious or not, is available for those who do not feel they are fit for parenthood.


20 posted on 12/16/2008 5:33:27 PM PST by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: annalex
Theoretical fears of “overpopulation” — whatever that means — are not a valid reason for a married couple to avoid pregnancies.

Your lack of reasoning is sinful also.

23 posted on 12/16/2008 5:55:42 PM PST by BipolarBob (Even the earth is bipolar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: annalex
The valid reasons are severe economic hardship (never an issue in America), considerable risk to the health of the mother or high probably of birth defects.

No American suffers severe economic hardship? Pardon my honest reply but that's ridiculous!

Also, who bestowed on you the authority to list the only reasons for childlessness?

We all witness married people who are unfit parents. IMHO, they should remain childless.

35 posted on 12/16/2008 11:42:07 PM PST by IIntense (o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson