Skip to comments.
ESV Study Bible: Covenant Vs. Dispensational
Monergism.com ^
| 21 Oct 2008
| Rev. John Samson
Posted on 10/22/2008 11:05:19 AM PDT by Gamecock
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
1
posted on
10/22/2008 11:05:20 AM PDT
by
Gamecock
To: topcat54
For Your Escatology Ping List?
2
posted on
10/22/2008 11:06:20 AM PDT
by
Gamecock
("...Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and folly to Gentiles" and both to Americans.)
To: Gamecock
Thank you. Our church went to ESV pew Bibles last year. Now I can get a study Bible, too :>)
3
posted on
10/22/2008 11:13:26 AM PDT
by
irishtenor
(Check out my blog at http://boompa53.blogspot.com/)
To: Alex Murphy; Dr. Eckleburg; HarleyD; irishtenor; Frumanchu; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; alpha-8-25-02; ...
Ping to a few who might be interested.
I look over study Bibles very closely before purchasing one. The stance of the editors on the Covenantal vs. Dispensational debate is critical in making my decision.
Tommorrow I will post a similar article on the equally important the topic of soteriology.
4
posted on
10/22/2008 11:13:34 AM PDT
by
Gamecock
("...Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and folly to Gentiles" and both to Americans.)
To: irishtenor
You betcha.
FWIW the “Reformation Study Bible” is ESV. It was done previously with the NKJV text and titled the “New Geneva Study Bible.” In spite of the Biblical texts consisting of different versions, the notes are the same. R.C. Sproul is the editor of this particular study Bible.
5
posted on
10/22/2008 11:18:39 AM PDT
by
Gamecock
("...Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and folly to Gentiles" and both to Americans.)
To: Gamecock
6
posted on
10/22/2008 11:29:04 AM PDT
by
irishtenor
(Check out my blog at http://boompa53.blogspot.com/)
To: Gamecock
That's such a good site, but they get so silly when they write about dispensationalism. I swear, they have no clue about what it is. Except it's bad. Because it's slightly younger than covenant theology. So it can't be right.
7
posted on
10/22/2008 11:30:30 AM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: Gamecock
Cool. My ESV
Reformation Study Bible isn't worn out yet, though. It took a beating early on, but with the duct tape in place it'll last a good while.
How is the binding???? Call me a book snob, but I hate spending serious book money on expensive glued together Bibles.
8
posted on
10/22/2008 11:42:47 AM PDT
by
Lee N. Field
("I've studied bible prophecy 30 years" usually means "I had Larkin's chart tattooed for reference.")
To: Gamecock
9
posted on
10/22/2008 12:16:59 PM PDT
by
raynearhood
("As for you, when wide awake you are asleep, and asleep when you write..." - Jerome)
To: BibChr
but they get so silly when they write about dispensationalism. I swear, they have no clue about what it is. Except it's bad. Because it's slightly younger than covenant theology. So it can't be right. Well, I don't know some of those guys, but I know Eric Costa. I think his critique of dispensationalism might go just a tad deeper than that. Have you read any reformed critiques of dispensationalism? Vern Poythress is very clear, cogent, friendly and detailed. I have also read what I consider to be the "meat" of the defenses of dispensationalism by Walvoord, Pentecost, Ryrie.
To: slnk_rules
Oh yeah, I’ve read critiques. They’re still often based on the Old Scofield Bible of (is it?) 1906, and they tend to be lame.
I want to read Poythress’; it is on my list. I’ll eventually force myself to grit my teeth through Riddlebarger, but only because it’s influential. Statements of his that I’ve read have me wondering why.
11
posted on
10/22/2008 12:44:37 PM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: BibChr
Theyre still often based on the Old Scofield Bible
"Classic" dispensationalism (that Oswald Allis wrote about 50 years ago) is alive and well out in the churches. I have heard such whackiness as you would not believe, with my own ears.
12
posted on
10/22/2008 12:55:37 PM PDT
by
Lee N. Field
("I've studied bible prophecy 30 years" usually means "I had Larkin's chart tattooed for reference.")
To: ItsOurTimeNow; HarleyD; suzyjaruki; nobdysfool; jkl1122; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Dr. Eckleburg; ...
Reformed Eschatology Ping List (REPL)
Biblically Optimistic and Gospel-Based "For these are the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled." (Luke 21:22)
13
posted on
10/22/2008 1:47:57 PM PDT
by
topcat54
("The selling of bad beer is a crime against Christian love.")
To: Lee N. Field
"Classic" dispensationalism (that Oswald Allis wrote about 50 years ago) is alive and well out in the churches. I have heard such whackiness as you would not believe, with my own ears. I recall sitting in a study once and having a guy start reading from his Bible only to find out it was the classic Scofield Notes he was quoting. I worked with a guy that would give away classic Scofield Bibles by the box load. He said the newer version was full of modernism.
14
posted on
10/22/2008 1:53:09 PM PDT
by
topcat54
("The selling of bad beer is a crime against Christian love.")
To: Lee N. Field
I’ll keep my eye on amazon, you might get a practiacally new one for a penny, Many big book dealers selling books for a penny and they make their profit off of the shipping. Of course the books they offer for a penny are the mass produced books.
To: irishtenor; Gamecock
I’m a fan of the New Geneva Study Bible. I prefer the NKJV to the ESV.
16
posted on
10/22/2008 4:35:10 PM PDT
by
PAR35
To: Gamecock
I must have 20 Bibles easily. I love the notes in my Thompson Chain Reference which I think is the best, but I really don’t like the NASB as well as I thought I would. It’s a dispensational version but the other notes far outweigh that problem. I have an ESV which I like and we use at church but it has no notes which is a real bummer. Alas, if I purchase ONE more Bible I think my wife will throw me out the window.
17
posted on
10/22/2008 5:05:03 PM PDT
by
HarleyD
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
To: HarleyD
19
posted on
10/22/2008 7:18:55 PM PDT
by
P8riot
(I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
To: HarleyD
I love the notes in my Thompson Chain Reference which I think is the best, but I really dont like the NASB as well as I thought I would. Its a dispensational version
How so? The NASB, or the Thompson Chain Reference stuff?
20
posted on
10/22/2008 7:36:46 PM PDT
by
Lee N. Field
("I've studied bible prophecy 30 years" usually means "I have everything Hal Lindsay ever wrote.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson