Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: slnk_rules

Oh yeah, I’ve read critiques. They’re still often based on the Old Scofield Bible of (is it?) 1906, and they tend to be lame.

I want to read Poythress’; it is on my list. I’ll eventually force myself to grit my teeth through Riddlebarger, but only because it’s influential. Statements of his that I’ve read have me wondering why.


11 posted on 10/22/2008 12:44:37 PM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: BibChr
They’re still often based on the Old Scofield Bible

"Classic" dispensationalism (that Oswald Allis wrote about 50 years ago) is alive and well out in the churches. I have heard such whackiness as you would not believe, with my own ears.

12 posted on 10/22/2008 12:55:37 PM PDT by Lee N. Field ("I've studied bible prophecy 30 years" usually means "I had Larkin's chart tattooed for reference.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson