Did you notice I asked for that EXPLICITLY in my post #255 this thread, before the pissing match started?Tell you what. Give us the image in #252, and a link to the original image you fed into photoshop to get that image, and the version of photoshop you used. Then tell us the exact angle you fed in, and let other people try using all that information and the original photo, if they can produce the image you did in #252.
Science is about reproducibility under controlled conditions, right?
In #268 js1138 wrote the following:
When I was asked for the settings I used I posted them. You persist in using settings that I did not use.
(SNIP)
Yes, I couldn't help but notice these exhanges. They stand out like a blinking neon sign.
Cordially,
I used his settings as well. They do not produce the distorted image he posted. I posted the settings that do produce that distortion and they are not even reasonable. I physically measured the offsets and angles he used in his posted picture and replicated it. Ergo, his conclusion is wrong.