[js1138]

May I point out that you have failed to show a series of renderings starting with one good one and demonstrating what happens whin you change the angle and nothing else.

You have also failed to explain how the pupil of the eye shows up in an image that is a graph of the distance from body to cloth.

[Swordmaker]

May I point out that you have failed to show a series of renderings starting with one good one and demonstrating what happens whin you change the angle and nothing else.

OK. Fine. I assumed the examples I already posted would be enough for those who could understand what was going on. I could point out your non-responses to direct questions about things that totally falsify your fraud.

Here you go, starting with the original, embossed every 18º, Height = 15 pixels, Opacity amount = 103%:

The effect of CHANGING ANGLES on the Pseudo-3D effect on the Shroud of Turin

Is that granular enough for you, or do I have to do it every 10º or every 1º? The fact is, JS, that your assertion is just flat WRONG. Period.

Now, let's do a similar experiment with changing the offsets to 1, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, and 100 pixels.

The effect of CHANGING OFFSET on the pseudo-3D effect on the Shroud of Turin

And this is proof that you perpetrated a FRAUD on the readers of this thread. The picture you posted had the offset set to somewhere between 60 and 75 pixels.

That is the ONLY way that you can create this blurry, distorted mess you needed to try to prove your assertion.

Incidentally, JS, I am far from "stupid" nor can I be easily fooled.