Don't ask questions for which you don't want to hear the answer.
As for the blurry image, it is from the same source as others I've posted. the only difference is the angle chosen in the Photoshop filter.
What you are seeing is the result of choosing an offset angle that doesn't correspond to the apparent angle of incident light in the image.
It isn't difficult to reproduce my result. I took an image from the internet, applied the Photoshop auto contrast correction, and then applied the same emboss filter that, with a different angle, produces a plausible 3D rendering.
That is a lie. The offset is obvious—and done deliberately to provide garbage.I did ask the question. Do you think we're stupid? Obviously, you do because you think you can foist off a fraud on us. It doesn't work.
I took an image from the internet, applied the Photoshop auto contrast correction, and then applied the same emboss filter that, with a different angle, produces a plausible 3D rendering.
No, you didn't. You applied an offset of almost 2" in the X axis and almost 1" in the Y axis, deliberately producing a blurry, mis-registered image to make your point. This is fraud... and a lie. There is absolutly no effort to properly reproduce the technique. Either you completely misunderstand how its done, or you have deliberately FAKED your evidence. This is what we've come to expect from those who fallow that other evidence faker, McCrone.You are either a Fruad, or you are incompetent.