The Church believed in Christ Jesus. That's really "pagan!" The Church opposed those who enticed Christians to embrace Judaism. That's not racist. The issue was religion, not ethnicity. His homilies are against Judaiziers, not Jews.
XS>John wanted them to reject YHvH and instead embrace the Paganism of Constantine's Roman church
The Church believed in Christ Jesus. That's really "pagan!" The Church opposed those who enticed Christians to embrace Judaism. That's not racist. The issue was religion, not ethnicity. His homilies are against Judaiziers(sic), not Jews.
14 posted on September 15, 2008 5:46:40 AM MDT by kosta50
John argued for worship of the Man-made religion of Pagan Rome: Sunday, Easter. What you call "church" is a man-made enterprise. It was given a charter to operate as a state-sponsored enterprise The Roman "church" rejected the YHvH commanded Feast of Passover( Nissan 14 ) A careful reading of John Chrystostom's homilies against the Jews, Clearly John Chrystostom is neither a Prophet nor is he Charitable. YHvH commanded worship on Shabbat and not on the Pagan "Sunday" of the Roman "church". YHvH commanded worship on Passover and not on the Pagan Easter(Pascha) of the Roman "church". John Chrystostom condemned the worship of YHvH, the creator of the universe.
shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach Adonai
by the Pontiff, Constantine, the Pagan Emperor.
and instead embraced the Pagan Easter(Pascha) on a very different date on a very
different calendar than than which was defined by the creator of the universe.
one would see it is racist as he calls YHvH's Chosen People unkind names.
These name are not based on the Charity of Yah'shua.