More to the point, you waltz into the thread with cryptic comments — COMPROMISERS — that imply anything other than a strict literal reading of the Bible is a compromise.
Am I wrong, and if so, explain your post.
This is an open thread, isn't it? "Waltz in"?
OEC, especially Ross’ view, is a strict literal view. YEC is not literal, it ignores Hebrew, context, etc. Literal defined as: What the Bible says when read with basic comprehension skills - not read superficially.