Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

REVIEW: "RELIGULOUS" [BARF ALERT! "Borat" director's new film, starring Bill Maher]
CHUD ^ | 8/21/2008 | Devin Faraci

Posted on 08/21/2008 9:26:17 AM PDT by Alex Murphy

This is the Apocalypse of St. Bill the Stoned.

Though funny, smart and often profane, Religulous doesn't want to send you out of the theater with a smile on your lips. The final moments of the film aren't laugh out loud funny, but a parade of images of death and destruction. This, Bill Maher says, is what humanity is in for if it doesn't get rid of the nuerological disorder that is religion.

You probably know my bias going into this film. I believe that religion is not just irrational but anti-rational, a Bronze Age worldview that should have been left behind when we started figuring out science. Bill Maher sees it the same way, and he makes no bones about it. But this isn't a review of Maher's ideas (10/10 on that one) but of the movie itself. How does Religulous stack up as a film?

It stacks up really well. The basic concept of the film has Maher traveling around the world talking to believers about what they believe, and most importantly why (or how they can believe it, for that matter). From the Holy Land to the Holy Land Experience theme park in Florida, Maher goes where the believers are and engages them on their home turf. That makes a huge difference in how the film feels, as does the fact that he actually confronts them. Religulous is directed by comic genius and Borat helmer Larry Charles, and it would have been easy to do this movie in a similar vein to that one - letting these people dig themselves a ridiculous hole with their own words - but Maher isn't interested in that. He wants to interact with these people, to confront them with the logic-hating aspects of their faiths and see what they come back with.

That's where I think the movie succeeds the most, but also one of the main places where detractors will come after it. They'll say that Maher is looking just to clown these people, but that isn't the case. He's more than slightly exasperated with the cop out answers that people give him (to the point where he actually gets kind of excited when a Jesus impersonater explains the parodoxical Holy Trinity by comparing it to the three states of water. It's bullshit, Maher says, but it's interesting and new bullshit to him), and this film is supposed to be funny so he's being funny, but he's also being fair. He's asking these people straight, direct questions. In return he's getting garbage like 'What if you die and find out you're wrong?'

And he's not going after random people in churches. He's going to self-styled leaders and full-time religious people as much as possible (although some of the film's best moments do come from tourists in the gift shop at The Holy Land Experience as they debate the place of Jews in the Kingdom of Heaven), the kind of people who are supposed to have the answers to give. The kind of people who are supposed to have given some thought to their faith. And yet again and again these are the people with the flimsiest crap, who present proof of the Almighty with miracles like God making it rain on cue during a party. Maher handily makes short work of most of these people, with a few interesting exceptions. The Catholics he speaks with come off fairly well as modern people who understand that the Bible is filled with allegories for how we should live our lives, not straight history and science lessons. Then there's the anti-Zionist rabbi who yaps so much that Maher actually walks out on the interview. It's the only time in the film that he's bested, albeit through sheer brute force.

The exchanges between Maher and the believers are obviously edited - the film would be days long if they weren't - but they feel fair. Interestingly, Charles has decided to include many, many shots of the documentary camera crew and quite a few moments that happen outside of the 'on air' parts of the interview process. The director himself is an almost constant presence in the film, with his dark clothes and long, grey streaked beard making him look sort of like a holy man himself. There's a transparency to the film that's intriguing; by including the crew and many off the cuff scenes of Maher in the car talking out his thoughts on religion the film keeps from becoming about Maher and becomes about the journey. About the search. I mean, sure, Maher's the star of the picture, but there's little pretense on display here. It doesn't feel like a Michael Moore 'hey look at me' op-ed documentary.

What's interesting is that Maher's not really spending time on the evils surrounding religion. He talks a bit about violence (especially when he's examining Islam) and makes passing mention of the Catholic sex abuse scandals and interviews a preacher dressed in a ridiculously expensive suit, but what Maher's really after is the basic beliefs. The evil things surrounding the religious institutions are too easily brushed off - these are people doing these terrible things, and people are fallible - so he strikes at the heart of the matter. How can you believe in a talking snake? A man living in the belly of a whale? How is a guy coming back from the dead after three days any less silly than Xenu putting millions of aliens in volcanoes ages ago and detonating nukes on them?

These beliefs are kind of hilarious - it's hard not to laugh when you realize that Mormons think God is a flesh and blood dude who lives on an alien planet - but it's Maher, as the irascible doubter, who brings a lot of comedy to the film. It's often laugh out loud funny, aided by funny asides from Larry Charles - inserts of stock and religious movie footage with perfect comedic timing, and a running gag of subtitles that question the factual inaccuracies and stupidities of the believers - and for most of the movie's running time, Religulous is fairly light-hearted while dealing with some pretty big issues. But as the movie moves overseas, as Maher hits Jerusalem and examines the radical Muslim problem in Amsterdam, the film slowly begins to darken. If there's a misstep in Religulous it's this transition, which is a little jarring. Maher's approach to believers - put them on the spot and cut down their arguments with logic and humor - often makes it easy to think of religion as silly, but that's not his final thesis. Charles saves some important bits from earlier interviews for his final summation; Arkansas Senator Mark Pryor, a fundamentalist who ran campaign ads where he clutched the Bible, is presented as a goofy guy in the beginning of the film but the movie comes back to the scary aspects of these fundamentalists being in power. They WANT to bring about the end of the world so that Jesus can come back, and since they think we're in the End Times right now they don't have much incentive to save the environment or prop up the economy or health care or anything else in a way that will help future generations. This is the scary stuff at the end of the movie - it doesn't matter if you believe in the Book of Revelations if your president does - but it's only at the end of the movie. Audiences may feel the rug being pulled out from under them as the final ten minutes descend into a scary slideshow of horrors.

As a piece of agitprop op-ed filmmaking, Religulous is often brilliant. It's definitely hilarious, sometimes to the point of leaving me wheezing and giggling. It's also essentially irrefutable - the argument between Maher and the believers really boils down to 'Why do you like chocolate?' The problem is that nobody makes huge political and military decisions based on how they feel about chocolate. The film's final moments, where Maher make a passionate exhortation to like-minded doubters to stand up against the irrationality that has gripped our world (an irrationality most lately on display in the megachurch 'debate' between Obama and McCain where they tried to outlove Jesus each other. Didn't anybody learn the lesson about electing guys who place all their faith in God instead of facts over the last eight years?) could be galvanizing to that silent 16% of Americans - a minority, by the way, bigger than blacks or Jews.

I do wonder what believers will say about the film. There's little doubt that few of them will bother seeing it - nothing seems to bug a believer so much as someone attacking their beliefs - but I wonder if any minds will be changed, if any people will be unsaved, such as it were. During Maher's stop over in Salt Lake City he talks to some ex-Mormons, and one of them says that his life was changed as soon as he saw how silly so many of the things Joseph Smith claimed were. Will Religulous present the essential silliness of religion to some on the fence religious folks?


TOPICS: Humor; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture; Skeptics/Seekers
KEYWORDS: agitprop; antichristian; antisemite; antitheism; atheism; atheismandstate; atheistsupremacist; billmaher; borat; communismkills; culturewar; goebbelswouldbeproud; hatespeech; hollywoodreds; liberalbigot; propaganda; religiousintolerance; religulous; stalinisttactics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
The last time Bill Maher was in a good film (I only use the word "good" in comparison, and very loosely at that) was Cannibal Women In The Avocado Jungle of Death and Pizza Man (actually, I can't vouch for the whole film, but I was amused by the first 20 mins or so).
1 posted on 08/21/2008 9:26:18 AM PDT by Alex Murphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Mr. Faraci is indulging his conceit of foolishness.


2 posted on 08/21/2008 9:30:14 AM PDT by sauropod (What do Osama and Obama have in common? They both have friends that bombed the Pentagon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Bill Maher is both unfunny and stupid. No wonder he’s a poster child for militant atheism.


3 posted on 08/21/2008 9:34:17 AM PDT by Thorin ("I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

“that religion is not just irrational but anti-rational, a Bronze Age worldview that should have been left behind when we started figuring out science.’

I have recently been studying this with my students. The fact is, the rise in protestantism brought about the greatest flowering of science in modern times.

Protestants had the doctrine of “sola scriptura” along with the “Great Commission” - the greatest command of jesus was to preach the gospel, and along with it the doctrine that to understand God one had to read his word.

This lead to protestants putting a huge emphasis on reading for all. It’s the reason that America started public education - it was the primary duty of all to make sure people could read the bible. (This is also the reason schools for the blind started to be developed - the handicapped were in need of salvation also).

A lot of protestants felt literature was frivolous, but the sciences were a noble endevour - understanding God’s creation.

Bill Maher is totally ignorant of the true effect religion has had on learning. If it wasn’t for religion, we might still be banging rocks to make fire.


4 posted on 08/21/2008 9:34:17 AM PDT by I still care ("Remember... for it is the doom of men that they forget" - Merlin, from Excalibur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Maher has some serious reaping coming to him.

The poster child for what not to do in life.


5 posted on 08/21/2008 9:37:03 AM PDT by Vision ("Test everything. Hold on to the Good." 1 Thessalonians 5:21)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
Someone should nominate him for President. He looks like the other guys on the dollar bills < /sarcasm >:


6 posted on 08/21/2008 9:41:28 AM PDT by weegee (The higher taxes that Obama demands of Americans are 'Above my Pay Grade'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

From Paul’s first letter to the Christians in Corinth. Clearly, unbelievers thinking Christians are foolish is not new nor should it be surprising.

18 For the word of the cross is folly to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.

19 For it is written, “I will destroy the wisdom of the wise,
and the discernment of the discerning I will thwart.”

20 Where is the one who is wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world?

21 For since, in the wisdom of God, the world did not know God through wisdom, it pleased God through the folly of what we preach to save those who believe.

22 For Jews demand signs and Greeks seek wisdom,

23 but we preach Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and folly to Gentiles,

24 but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

25 For the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men.


7 posted on 08/21/2008 9:41:36 AM PDT by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
The final moments of the film aren't laugh out loud funny, but a parade of images of death and destruction. This, Bill Maher says, is what humanity is in for if it doesn't get rid of the nuerological disorder that is religion.

Not since The Eternal Jew has someone been so proud to make a film demonizing those of faith.

8 posted on 08/21/2008 9:45:31 AM PDT by weegee (The higher taxes that Obama demands of Americans are 'Above my Pay Grade'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I still care

Sorry about all the spelling mistakes. I am typing with a kitten playing with the keyboard. Does anyone want a kitten?


9 posted on 08/21/2008 9:46:37 AM PDT by I still care ("Remember... for it is the doom of men that they forget" - Merlin, from Excalibur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Great post.


10 posted on 08/21/2008 9:48:23 AM PDT by Petronski (The God of Life will condemn the Chinese government. Laogai means GULAG.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: weegee

I predict an early demise at the box office, followed by a trip to the shelves at Blockbuster, where it will come to rest next to “Sicko” and all those anti-war Hollywood movies that did soooooooo well....


12 posted on 08/21/2008 9:49:32 AM PDT by Right Cal Gal (Abraham Lincoln would have let Berkeley leave the Union without a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
As a piece of agitprop op-ed filmmaking, Religulous is often brilliant.

Naked Communist:

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/agitprop

ag·it·prop

–noun

1. agitation and propaganda, esp. for the cause of communism.

2. (often initial capital letter) an agency or department, as of a government, that directs and coordinates agitation and propaganda.

3. Also, ag·it·prop·ist. a person who is trained or takes part in such activities.

–adjective

4. of or pertaining to agitprop.

----

[Origin: 1930–35; < Russ Agitpróp, orig. for Agitatsiónno-propagandístskiĭ otdél Agitation Propaganda Section (of the Central Committee, or a local committee, of the Communist Party); subsequently the head of such a section, or in compound names of political education organs, as agitpropbrigáda, etc.]


13 posted on 08/21/2008 9:51:13 AM PDT by weegee (The higher taxes that Obama demands of Americans are 'Above my Pay Grade'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
So the review mentions an "interview" with a rabbi that Mr. Maher walked out on.

And it mentions different things about Christians. There is A reference comparing Christian belief in Jesus and the Resurection to Xenu. But no outward discussion of scenes of Scientologists being confronted. Or Muslims. Or Wiccan. Or Pagans. Or Satanists. Or...

AntiChristian screed.

If ALL religion is false, why do the critics of faith only target ONE faith?

14 posted on 08/21/2008 9:53:53 AM PDT by weegee (The higher taxes that Obama demands of Americans are 'Above my Pay Grade'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

Do not use potty language or references to potty language on the Religion Forum.


15 posted on 08/21/2008 9:54:45 AM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: weegee
If ALL religion is false, why do the critics of faith only target ONE faith?

Isn't it sad that some people find the Holy Spirit more uncomfortable to be around than a mob of screaming jihadists?

16 posted on 08/21/2008 9:56:29 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (This election is like running in the Special Olympics. Even if McCain wins, we're still retarded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

“Staying in the airplane when it hits the building, say what you want about it, it’s not cowardly.” - Bill Maher on the Islamist attacks on the WTC and Pentagon on 9-17-2001.


17 posted on 08/21/2008 9:59:29 AM PDT by weegee (The higher taxes that Obama demands of Americans are 'Above my Pay Grade'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

My bet is that this little girl is too scared $h!tless to attack Islam.

Let's find a way to contact him and ask him. Why don’ t we e-mail Foxnews.com, O’Reilley, Hannity and ask them to ask the idiot that exact question. How can we contact him, anyone know?

18 posted on 08/21/2008 10:02:51 AM PDT by Bitsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
"an irrationality most lately on display in the megachurch 'debate' between Obama and McCain where they tried to outlove Jesus each other."

The truth about Barack Obama's faith

Lie: Barack Obama is a Muslim.

Truth: Senator Obama has never been a Muslim, was not raised as a Muslim, and is a committed Christian. Further, this myth perpetuates unfortunate falsehoods about the Muslim-American community that are offensive to people of all faiths.

Only seems fair to ask him about his faith when he denies bluntly that he studied the Koran as a child even though he mentioned it in his book.

His mother was an atheist and his fathers were non-observant muslims. So who baptised the young Barack Jr.?

19 posted on 08/21/2008 10:03:13 AM PDT by weegee (The higher taxes that Obama demands of Americans are 'Above my Pay Grade'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Freedom of religion means nothing to that pothead.


20 posted on 08/21/2008 10:04:06 AM PDT by weegee (The higher taxes that Obama demands of Americans are 'Above my Pay Grade'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson