Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: dangus

I assume that references to Christmas as the celebration of the Incarnation reflect the inadequate knowledge of human biology of some our traditional sources. In this day and age, I think that, as a matter of principle, Christians should emphasize Christ’s Incarnation - the fact that He was fully God and fully man - from the moment of His conception.

I was also thinking, at the time of my original post, of the fact that posts on this forum sometimes indicate some confusion about Christ’s fully human and divine Personhood.


25 posted on 08/06/2008 12:20:17 PM PDT by Tax-chick (When life gives you habaneros, make hot sauce!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Tax-chick

>> I assume that references to Christmas as the celebration of the Incarnation reflect the inadequate knowledge of human biology of some our traditional sources. <<

I doubt that. Looking at his language, Luke certainly knew quite well Christ was present at conception.


27 posted on 08/06/2008 12:30:25 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Tax-chick

Excellent comments, by the way. Just a clarification: Christ is one Divine Person (the Word), but with two natures: human and divine. That’s the Incarnation, and I agree that we do well to emphasize this (not that we shouldn’t celebrate Christmas to the full).

God bless!


28 posted on 08/06/2008 12:32:45 PM PDT by koinonia ("Thou art bought with the blood of God... Be the companion of Christ." -St. Ephraim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson