I tend to agree with this ruling. Apprising.org is all about condemning Christians who don’t agree 100 percent with the guy who publishes that site. Tiring. Seems he’s gone overboard in his slander against other Christians.
If the author of the blog had some harsh things to say about Abanes and Warren, then he certainly was not slandering CHRISTIANS.
Isn’t that what most blogs are for? Is Ken allowed to publish his own viewpoint?
For example: “I think you have engaged in libel and defamation with that post, therefore you should be sued.” Is that constitutional?
you have evidentally not been forced to leave a purpose driven church
Wow. That’s certainly a new definition of free speech.
Anyone who actually practices discernment (as Paul directed the Bereans to do) should be silenced. And anyone who brings attention to false teachings the Bible warns about not allowed to speak.
Yup, I’m speechless at your analysis of the situation.