[AnalogReigns]

just one line in the Apostles’ Creed.

No Christian that I know of objects to any line in the Apostles Creed--as it defines "mere" Christianity, and you are well aware that is not what I was objecting to.

Rather I was objecting to the overt statement--and bias in your article to call anyone NOT a Roman Catholic not a Christian, which the article above does--and so by definition is not worthy of being called an "Ecumenical" posting.

The content of your posting is a violation in and of itself of the "Ecumenical" standard in the new Religion guidelines.

Thank the Lord Jesus, Head of the one Holy Catholic Church--superseding all human institutions, that the creeds nowhere say "Roman," the insulting utterly non-ecumenical article above notwithstanding.

[Religion Moderator]

Again, the definition of "Holy Catholic Church" in the article is a statement of belief. That you disagree the term means what the author says it means does not make his definition antagonistic.

You had the option of stating what you believe the term means without being antagonistic. You didn't.

Leave the thread.