Skip to comments.
Various Christian Creeds Down through the Ages
BYUTV ^
| 2000
| John W Welch
Posted on 05/25/2008 4:11:19 AM PDT by restornu
Click to watch video
TOPICS: Apologetics; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: churchhistory; creeds; lds; ldschurch; ldsvideo; mormon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-164 next last
1
posted on
05/25/2008 4:11:19 AM PDT
by
restornu
To: Adam-ondi-Ahman; America always; Antonello; asparagus; BlueMoose; Choose Ye This Day; ...
Creeds of Christendom
Creeds of Christendom
|
|
|
| Ancient | Baptist | Episcopal | Lutheran | Mennonite | Methodist | Orthodox | Pentecostal | Presbyterian | Puritan | Quaker | Reformed | Roman Catholic | Salvation Army | UCC | Miscellany
Ancient Symbols
- Creeds in the Bible
- Ireneaus Rule of Faith
- Hippolytus' account of the baptismal service
- The Apostle's Creed
- The Creed of Nicaea as approved by the Nicene Council (A.D. 325)
- The First Ecumenical council of Nicaea was called by emperor Constantine. The council met to deal with the schism created by Arianism. The Arians wished to avoid the heresy of Sabellius who believed in a divine monad which, by expansion, projected itself as Father, Son and Holy Spirit--a form of Modalism. The Arians separated the Son from God entirely so that they believed he was a creature having a beginning. "There was when he was not." The Son was but God's first creation, yet out of nothing and hence has preeminence over the rest of creation.
- The symbol answers the question, "Who is Jesus Christ."
Its answer: God
- The Nicene Creed as approved by the Council of Constantinople (A.D. 381)
- -- The Nicene Creed -- Constantinopolitan Creed -- Creed of 150 Fathers
- Usually associated with the Council of Constantinople this symbol is an expansion and revision of the earlier Creed of Nicaea with which it is often confused. This is the creed recited in churches. The council met to refute Apollinarianism. Apollinarius taught that Jesus was a combination of the divine Logos spirit, a sensitive human soul and a human body. He taught that Jesus did not have a human spirit. His views were based on the platonic tripartite view of human nature. The council condemned this view in order to show that Christ, as truly human, could redeem the whole person.
- The symbol emphasizes the Trinitarian faith.
- The symbol is very suitable for liturgical use and was used as an early baptismal and eucharistic creed. It goes beyond the Creed of Nicaea in its affirmation of the full deity of the Spirit though it uses biblical rather than philosophical terms to do so. The filioque clause found in the Western version of this creed is one of the major disagreements between the Eastern and Western branches of Christianity. This clause was not accepted even by the Western Church until the turn of the first millennium.
- Further Notes on the Nicene Creed
- Notes on the Filioque Clause Controversy
- The Church in the Nicene Creed
- Other documents of the First Council of Constantinople
- Notes from the ecumenical councils
- The Council of Sardica Canon V (A.D. 343)
- The council of Sardica was the first synod, which in some sense asserted Roman primacy.
- Confession of Saint Patrick (A.D. 390-461)
- The Definition of Chalcedon (A.D. 451)
- The council of Chalcedon met to resolve the Monophysite controversy in which Eutyches had refused to confess the existence of two natures in Christ both after the union as well as before. The definition summarizes the Church's teaching on the natures of Christ largely in negative terms.
- Canons of the Council of Orange (A.D. 529)
- The Council of Orange was an outgrowth of the controversy between Augustine and Pelagius. This controversy had to do with degree to which a human being is responsible for his or her own salvation, and the role of the grace of God in bringing about salvation. The Pelagians held that human beings are born in a state of innocence, i.e., that there is no such thing as a sinful nature or original sin. As a result of this view, they held that a state of sinless perfection was achievable in this life. The Council of Orange dealt with the Semi-Pelagian doctrine that the human race, though fallen and possessed of a sinful nature, is still "good" enough to able to lay hold of the grace of God through an act of unredeemed human will. As you read the Canons of the Council of Orange, you will be able to see where John Calvin derived his views of the total depravity of the human race.
- Quicumque vult (Athanasian Creed) (ca. A.D. 500) (Encarta® article)
- The fullest statement of the Trinitarian faith in abstract metaphysical terms.
- Part one: Augustinian definition of the Trinity
- Each persona of the Trinity is fully divine
- Each is unique to itself
- Each is within the other, in perpetual intercommunication and motion, coequal and coeternal.
- Damnatory clause for those who do not accept this teaching.
- Part two: The doctrine of Christ
- Anti-
- Appollinarian
- Nestorian
- Eutychian
- Monophysite
- Reaffirms Ephesian and Chalcedonian council decisions.
- Damnatory clause for those who do not accept this teaching.
- Anathemas of the Second Council of Constantinople (A.D. 533)
- Creeds and Statements - from the Period after A.D. 600
- Later Creeds
Index Adventists
Baptist & Anabaptist
Christian Church - Disciples of Christ
Evangelical Free Church of America
Episcopal/Anglican
Lutheran
- The Augsburg Confession of Faith (& a whole lot more) - Philip Melancthon (1530)
- The Book of Concord
The Book of Concord (Link 2) - The Lutheran Confessions from 1529-1580
- The Augsburg Confession(1530,1540) - Philip Melanchthon
-
- Written on behalf of the Protestant territories of Northern Germany for presentation to emperor Charles V at the Diet of Augsburg. Melanchthon's twenty one original articles were composed as a response to John Eck's attack on the Protestants as guilty of being ancient heresies. Thus the articles attempt to show that the Protestant faith is in line with the ancient Church. Many, but not all, of the articles were acceptable to Rome. In 1540 Melancthon revised the confession to be acceptable to Calvin. The Lutherans rejected this revision and Melancthon himself. Melancthon's followers would then join the reformed camp.
- Appendix - Catalog of Testimonies
- Luther's Large Catechism
- Luther's Little Book
- The Smalcald Articles of Martin Luther
- Written for Elector Frederick and the Smalcald League stipulating matters that could be discussed with Roman Catholics at a council they were invited to by Pope Paul III at Mantua. The Articles were written at a time when Luther felt death was near and hence they are a powerful expression of his personal faith.
- Treatise on the Power and Primacy of the Pope - (1563) Melancthon
- When Luther's Smalcald Articles were added to the Book of Concord this small tract was attached to smooth over Luther's condemnation of the pope.
- 95 Theses - Martin Luther (1517)
- Doctrinal Position of the Missouri Synod (1932)
- Confession of Faith of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America
- The Large Catechism - Martin Luther
- The Large Catechism is an expansion of the Short Catechism through a collection and revision of several of Luther's sermons. Both catechisms were incorporated into the Book of Concord.
- Luther's Small Catechism - Martin Luther
- Lutheran and other Christian resources on the net - OK it's not a creed but it's a good link!
- Porvoo Agreements with Anglicans
- Project Wittenberg - Everything Luther(an)
Mennonite/Anabaptist
Methodist/Arminian
Orthodox
Pentecostal
Reformed
Religious Society of Friends
Roman Catholic
Independent Old Catholic Church
United Church of Christ
Miscellany
|
2
posted on
05/25/2008 4:12:21 AM PDT
by
restornu
( Beloved, if God so loved us, we ought also to love one another. 1 John 11)
To: restornu
Below is the Creed of the Church, the body of Christ, that Bible believing Christians live by, ignoring the heresies of so many sects and denominations who follow traditions and substitute the laws of man for the laws of God.
[1. In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
2. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
3. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
4. And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.
5. And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.]
13. But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived.
14. But continue thou in the things which thou hast learned and hast been assured of, knowing of whom thou hast learned them;
15. And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.
16. All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
17. That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.
16. For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty.
17. For he received from God the Father honour and glory, when there came such a voice to him from the excellent glory, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.
18. And this voice which came from heaven we heard, when we were with him in the holy mount.
19. We have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well that ye take heed, as unto a light that shineth in a dark place, until the day dawn, and the day star arise in your hearts:
20. Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.
21. For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.
3
posted on
05/25/2008 4:23:35 AM PDT
by
kindred
(I am now a third party conservative, the GOP is destroyed, conservative party is necessary.)
To: restornu
Whew! I didn’t realize there were so many different definitions of what a Christian is!
4
posted on
05/25/2008 7:46:56 AM PDT
by
TheDon
To: TheDon; restornu
Is this the “anti-Christian” thread for the day?
5
posted on
05/25/2008 7:56:21 AM PDT
by
greyfoxx39
(Protected species legislation enacted May 2008.)
To: greyfoxx39
Hi greyfoxxx39,
I don’t think you can get more pro-Christian than this thread!
6
posted on
05/25/2008 8:00:25 AM PDT
by
TheDon
To: TheDon; restornu
I dont think you can get more pro-Christian than this thread! Starting with the Articles of Faith? And a BYU propaganda video trying to validate the mormon claims of "restoration".
I think not. Nice try, though.
7
posted on
05/25/2008 8:08:54 AM PDT
by
greyfoxx39
(Protected species legislation enacted May 2008.)
To: restornu
Good grief.
I kinda get the feeling that this post is:
“naner naner naner - I'm right you're wrong”.
I could be mistaken however.
8
posted on
05/25/2008 8:10:45 AM PDT
by
svcw
(There is no plan B.)
To: svcw
The Baptist Confession of 1688 is a bit over the top.
9
posted on
05/25/2008 8:33:13 AM PDT
by
TheDon
To: restornu; Elsie; greyfoxx39; Gamecock
An
LDS thread on the
creeds of the Christian (non-LDS) churches just wouldn't be complete without a quotation of Joseph Smith's first vision....
I was answered that I must join none of them, for they were all wrong; and the Personage who addressed me said that all their creeds were an abomination in his sight; that those professors were all corrupt; that: they draw near to me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me, they teach for doctrines the commandments of men, having a form of godliness, but they deny the power thereof. Joseph Smith's "First Vision", verse 19, taken from History of the [LDS] Church, Vol. 1, Chapters 1-5
10
posted on
05/25/2008 8:57:20 AM PDT
by
Alex Murphy
("Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?" -- Galatians 4:16)
To: greyfoxx39; TheDon; All
Well, since this IS the Lord’s Day, why don’t we just read what we want, form our opinions, and wait for tomorrow to post them. That way, we can keep the Spirit of the Day without feeling the gravity of disagreement.
At least, that’s the way I see it. :o])
11
posted on
05/25/2008 9:03:20 AM PDT
by
Monkey Face
("Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without any proof.")
To: Monkey Face
The mormon perspective ... denigrate Orthodox Christianity in order to try and carve out a niche for the heresies of mormonism to be ‘just like the rest of Christendom. Figures that would be fine with some.
12
posted on
05/25/2008 9:43:31 AM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
To: svcw
I kinda get the feeling that this post is: naner naner naner - I'm right you're wrong. I could be mistaken however. From my observations here on FR, that pretty seems to sum up the whole LDS faith.
13
posted on
05/25/2008 10:08:46 AM PDT
by
SkyPilot
("I wasn't in church during the time when the statements were made.")
To: Monkey Face
Well, since this IS the Lords Day, why dont we just read what we want, form our opinions, and wait for tomorrow to post them. Why not have the thread pulled then, and repost it tomorrow? We could all concentrate on the Lord's day that way.
Plenty of room here for posts "without disagreement"
14
posted on
05/25/2008 10:10:10 AM PDT
by
greyfoxx39
(Protected species legislation enacted May 2008.)
To: greyfoxx39
I, for one, will pretend the thread is a reference point, and as such, I can wait until tomorrow to discuss pro or con.
For today, I’d rather concentrate on things that are truly important to me, such as increasing my spirituality by changing my negative outlook about one thing. The thing is not the point. The outlook is.
For instance, I can choose to feel compassion for Ted Kennedy and his family, rather than concentrate on the politics they represent. See how easy that is?
:o])
15
posted on
05/25/2008 10:15:48 AM PDT
by
Monkey Face
("Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without any proof.")
To: Monkey Face
16
posted on
05/25/2008 10:22:23 AM PDT
by
greyfoxx39
(Protected species legislation enacted May 2008.)
To: greyfoxx39
17
posted on
05/25/2008 10:23:36 AM PDT
by
Monkey Face
("Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without any proof.")
To: restornu
Some creeds were more political documents than religous documents.
For example, there was a time when the King of England was getting a little too cozy with the Catholic church, and even married a Catholic woman. Parliament wanted to overthrow the king because of it. Fearing that Parliament would call on Ireland to help toss him off the throne, the King reached out to Scotland for help. Scotland said they would help IF the King had the CoE switch over to Presbyterianism. The Westminster Confession of faith was born out of those negotiations as a vehicle to help the king secure the help of the Scots to win a civil war.
18
posted on
05/25/2008 10:33:44 AM PDT
by
Grig
To: Grig; P-Marlowe; MHGinTN; FastCoyote; Colofornian; Revelation 911
For example, there was a time when the King of England was getting a little too cozy with the Catholic church Gosh, that sounds JUST like Utah!
The Westminster Confession of faith was born out of those negotiations
The flourishing and growth of the FLDS was born out of the inaction of Utah and Arizona.
" Fearing that Parliament the LDS authorities would call on Ireland loyal members to help toss him off the throne out of office...Shurtleff refrained from following through on 80 warrants against the Kingston family, "We elected not to do that to try and work with their attorney. And, of course, the result of that was all our subjects disappeared, our targets disappeared and we didn't get the warrants served like we hoped to do," said Shurtleff."
Is this the type of lesson you hoped to provide in your post regarding the Westminster Confession? Something along the lines of "faith and politics"?
19
posted on
05/25/2008 11:18:14 AM PDT
by
greyfoxx39
(Protected species legislation enacted May 2008.)
To: Grig; restornu; greyfoxx39; P-Marlowe; MHGinTN; FastCoyote; Colofornian; Revelation 911
Some creeds were more political documents than religous documents. For example, there was a time when the King of England was getting a little too cozy with the Catholic church, and even married a Catholic woman. Parliament wanted to overthrow the king because of it. Fearing that Parliament would call on Ireland to help toss him off the throne, the King reached out to Scotland for help. Scotland said they would help IF the King had the CoE switch over to Presbyterianism. The Westminster Confession of faith was born out of those negotiations as a vehicle to help the king secure the help of the Scots to win a civil war.Wot a coinkydink that someone should mention the WCF....
20
posted on
05/25/2008 12:34:32 PM PDT
by
Alex Murphy
("Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?" -- Galatians 4:16)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-164 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson